Evaluating and Improving the Quality of Surgical Operative Notes at the Port Sudan Teaching Hospital

Background Thorough and standardized documentation of operative notes is essential for effective communication, patient safety, legal protection, and the continuity of care. However, in many hospitals in Sudan, surgeons often use non-standardized methods, resulting in inconsistent and incomplete records. This study evaluates the quality of operative notes at the Port Sudan Teaching Hospital using the Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCSEng) guidelines, aiming to improve compliance and documentation practices. Methods A clinical audit was conducted in two cycles at the General Surgery Department. The first cycle, a retrospective review of 50 surgical notes, was carried out over one week in July 2024. The second cycle conducted prospectively on another 50 notes throughout September 2024, involved the implementation of an improved proforma and staff training. Data were collected using a standardized checklist aligned with Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI) guidelines, covering 18 documentation criteria. Results were analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2016 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington, United States) to assess improvements in compliance. Results The compliance with documentation standards increased significantly from 51.9% in the first cycle to 82.1% in the second cycle. Notable improvements were observed in recording operative findings (17, 34%), complications (34, 68%), and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis (47, 94%). Despite the overall progress, modest improvements were noted in documenting the anesthetist's name (2.5, 5%) and the surgeon's signature (3, 6%). These findings underscore the positive impact of structured proformas and targeted staff training. Conclusion The implementation of standardized documentation tools and staff training significantly improved the quality of surgical operative notes at the Port Sudan Teaching Hospital. While notable progress was achieved, continued efforts, including digital solutions and regular audits, are needed to sustain these improvements and promote patient safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2024-12-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.75815
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Digital Imaging in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating and Improving the Quality of Surgical Operative Notes at the Port Sudan Teaching Hospital

Emad M. Hassan, Almigdad Ali, Galaleldin Mohamed Abdeljalil Mohamed, Amir Alamin Ahmed Altyeb et al.
12 citations
Cureus
Digital Imaging in Medicine
6.52
article

Evaluating and Improving the Quality of Surgical Operative Notes at the Port Sudan Teaching Hospital

Emad M. Hassan, Almigdad Ali, Galaleldin Mohamed Abdeljalil Mohamed, Amir Alamin Ahmed Altyeb, Amr Mohamed, Fatima Osman, Mustafa Mohamed, Khalid Ahmed, Abubakr Muhammed, Alnazeer Y Abdelbagi, Manal A Abd-Elkarim, E Suliman, Mohey Aldien Ahmed Elamin Elnour, Mahmoud Ali Mohamed Abdalrahman
article en
12 citations

Abstract

Background Thorough and standardized documentation of operative notes is essential for effective communication, patient safety, legal protection, and the continuity of care. However, in many hospitals in Sudan, surgeons often use non-standardized methods, resulting in inconsistent and incomplete records. This study evaluates the quality of operative notes at the Port Sudan Teaching Hospital using the Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCSEng) guidelines, aiming to improve compliance and documentation practices. Methods A clinical audit was conducted in two cycles at the General Surgery Department. The first cycle, a retrospective review of 50 surgical notes, was carried out over one week in July 2024. The second cycle conducted prospectively on another 50 notes throughout September 2024, involved the implementation of an improved proforma and staff training. Data were collected using a standardized checklist aligned with Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI) guidelines, covering 18 documentation criteria. Results were analyzed using Microsoft Excel 2016 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington, United States) to assess improvements in compliance. Results The compliance with documentation standards increased significantly from 51.9% in the first cycle to 82.1% in the second cycle. Notable improvements were observed in recording operative findings (17, 34%), complications (34, 68%), and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis (47, 94%). Despite the overall progress, modest improvements were noted in documenting the anesthetist's name (2.5, 5%) and the surgeon's signature (3, 6%). These findings underscore the positive impact of structured proformas and targeted staff training. Conclusion The implementation of standardized documentation tools and staff training significantly improved the quality of surgical operative notes at the Port Sudan Teaching Hospital. While notable progress was achieved, continued efforts, including digital solutions and regular audits, are needed to sustain these improvements and promote patient safety.

CureusVol. 16(12)
Riyadh Armed Forces Hospital (SA), University of Khartoum (SD), Al-Neelain University (SD), Sudan Medical Specialization Board (SD), University of Gezira (SD), Red Sea University (SD)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Digital Imaging in Medicine
6.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.