Non-Euclidean motion planning with graphs of geodesically convex sets

Computing optimal, collision-free trajectories for high-dimensional systems is a challenging and important problem. Sampling-based planners struggle with the dimensionality, whereas trajectory optimizers may get stuck in local minima due to inherent nonconvexities in the optimization landscape. The use of mixed-integer programming to encapsulate these nonconvexities and find globally optimal trajectories has recently shown great promise, thanks in part to tight convex relaxations and efficient approximation strategies that greatly reduce runtimes. These approaches were previously limited to Euclidean configuration spaces, precluding their use with mobile bases or continuous revolute joints. In this paper, we handle such scenarios by modeling configuration spaces as Riemannian manifolds, and we describe a reduction procedure for the zero-curvature case to a mixed-integer convex optimization problem. We further present a method for obtaining approximate solutions via piecewise-linear approximations that is applicable to manifolds of arbitrary curvature. We demonstrate our results on various robot platforms, including producing efficient collision-free trajectories for a PR2 bimanual mobile manipulator.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Robotics Research
Published
2024-12-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02783649241302419
Primary Topic
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-Euclidean motion planning with graphs of geodesically convex sets

Max Simchowitz, Thomas Cohn, Russ Tedrake, Mark Petersen
The International Journal of Robotics Research
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
article

Non-Euclidean motion planning with graphs of geodesically convex sets

Max Simchowitz, Thomas Cohn, Russ Tedrake, Mark Petersen
article en

Abstract

Computing optimal, collision-free trajectories for high-dimensional systems is a challenging and important problem. Sampling-based planners struggle with the dimensionality, whereas trajectory optimizers may get stuck in local minima due to inherent nonconvexities in the optimization landscape. The use of mixed-integer programming to encapsulate these nonconvexities and find globally optimal trajectories has recently shown great promise, thanks in part to tight convex relaxations and efficient approximation strategies that greatly reduce runtimes. These approaches were previously limited to Euclidean configuration spaces, precluding their use with mobile bases or continuous revolute joints. In this paper, we handle such scenarios by modeling configuration spaces as Riemannian manifolds, and we describe a reduction procedure for the zero-curvature case to a mixed-integer convex optimization problem. We further present a method for obtaining approximate solutions via piecewise-linear approximations that is applicable to manifolds of arbitrary curvature. We demonstrate our results on various robot platforms, including producing efficient collision-free trajectories for a PR2 bimanual mobile manipulator.

The International Journal of Robotics ResearchVol. 44(10-11)
Harvard University (US), Moscow Institute of Thermal Technology (RU)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Non-Euclidean motion planning with graphs of geodesically convex sets — Max Simchowitz, Thomas Cohn, et al. · The International Journal of Robotics Research (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS