Multiscale Measurements of Greenhouse Gas Emissions at U.S. Natural Gas Liquefaction Terminals

Addressing methane emissions across the liquefied natural gas (LNG) supply chain is key to reducing climate impacts of LNG. Actions to address methane emissions have emphasized the importance of the use of measurement-informed emissions inventories given the systematic underestimation in official greenhouse gas (GHG) emission inventories. Despite significant progress in field measurements of GHG emissions across the natural gas supply chain, no detailed measurements at US liquefaction terminals are publicly available. In this work, we conduct multiscale, periodic measurements of methane and carbon dioxide emissions at two US LNG terminals over a 16-month campaign. We find that methane emission intensity varied from 0.007% to 0.045%, normalized to methane in LNG production. Carbon dioxide emissions accounted for over 95% of total GHG emissions using 100-year global warming potential (GWP) for methane. Thus, contrary to observations across other natural gas supply chain segments, we find that reported GHG emissions intensity closely matches measurement informed GHG emissions intensity of 0.24-0.27 kg CO<sub>2</sub>e/kg CH<sub>4</sub>. In the context of developing LNG supply chain emissions intensity, we conclude that the use of the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program emissions intensity provides reasonably accurate estimates of total GHG emissions at LNG terminals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
Published
2024-12-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.4c00713
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multiscale Measurements of Greenhouse Gas Emissions at U.S. Natural Gas Liquefaction Terminals

Gregory B. Ross, Selina Roman-White, Arvind Pawan Ravikumar, Dorit Hammerling et al.
3 citations
Environmental Science & Technology Letters
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
0.85
article

Multiscale Measurements of Greenhouse Gas Emissions at U.S. Natural Gas Liquefaction Terminals

Gregory B. Ross, Selina Roman-White, Arvind Pawan Ravikumar, Dorit Hammerling, Olga Khaliukova, Fiji George, Yuanrui Zhu
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Addressing methane emissions across the liquefied natural gas (LNG) supply chain is key to reducing climate impacts of LNG. Actions to address methane emissions have emphasized the importance of the use of measurement-informed emissions inventories given the systematic underestimation in official greenhouse gas (GHG) emission inventories. Despite significant progress in field measurements of GHG emissions across the natural gas supply chain, no detailed measurements at US liquefaction terminals are publicly available. In this work, we conduct multiscale, periodic measurements of methane and carbon dioxide emissions at two US LNG terminals over a 16-month campaign. We find that methane emission intensity varied from 0.007% to 0.045%, normalized to methane in LNG production. Carbon dioxide emissions accounted for over 95% of total GHG emissions using 100-year global warming potential (GWP) for methane. Thus, contrary to observations across other natural gas supply chain segments, we find that reported GHG emissions intensity closely matches measurement informed GHG emissions intensity of 0.24-0.27 kg CO<sub>2</sub>e/kg CH<sub>4</sub>. In the context of developing LNG supply chain emissions intensity, we conclude that the use of the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program emissions intensity provides reasonably accurate estimates of total GHG emissions at LNG terminals.

Environmental Science & Technology LettersVol. 12(1)
Colorado School of Mines (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, Environmental Defense Fund
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.