Reclaiming Derogatory Language: Self-Reports and Interbeat Intervals

Minorities reclaim derogatory labels to change their meaning. However, previous research on reclamation has focused on the perception of self-labeling with derogatory labels in an ecologically invalid context, using self-reports that may be influenced by norms. We examined how recordings containing derogatory terms against gay people are perceived, using both a self-report and an unobtrusive heartbeat measure. In the experiment ( n = 103), we showed that individuals perceived statements with derogatory labels as less offensive when participants of the Gay Pride (a pro-LGBT+ march) used them and as more offensive when they were used by participants of the March for Life and Family (a conservative march). This effect was stronger among gay men. Nonetheless, the sexual identity and the content of speech played no role in the case of the heartbeat. The paper discusses the discrepancy between declarative and nondeclarative measures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Language and Social Psychology
Published
2024-12-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x241299791
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.22

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reclaiming Derogatory Language: Self-Reports and Interbeat Intervals

Aleksandra Świderska, Michał Bilewicz, Dominik Puchała
5 citations
Journal of Language and Social Psychology
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
3.22
article

Reclaiming Derogatory Language: Self-Reports and Interbeat Intervals

Aleksandra Świderska, Michał Bilewicz, Dominik Puchała
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Minorities reclaim derogatory labels to change their meaning. However, previous research on reclamation has focused on the perception of self-labeling with derogatory labels in an ecologically invalid context, using self-reports that may be influenced by norms. We examined how recordings containing derogatory terms against gay people are perceived, using both a self-report and an unobtrusive heartbeat measure. In the experiment ( n = 103), we showed that individuals perceived statements with derogatory labels as less offensive when participants of the Gay Pride (a pro-LGBT+ march) used them and as more offensive when they were used by participants of the March for Life and Family (a conservative march). This effect was stronger among gay men. Nonetheless, the sexual identity and the content of speech played no role in the case of the heartbeat. The paper discusses the discrepancy between declarative and nondeclarative measures.

Journal of Language and Social PsychologyVol. 44(1)
University of Warsaw (PL)
Narodowe Centrum Nauki
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
3.22
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.