Quality of Hospices Used by Medicare Advantage and Traditional Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries

These findings suggest that policymakers should consider policies for MA programs that incentivize referrals to high-quality hospices and approaches to educating beneficiaries on identifying high-quality hospice care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Network Open
Published
2024-12-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.51227
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.09

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality of Hospices Used by Medicare Advantage and Traditional Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries

Norma B. Coe, Chuxuan Sun, Lindsay White
2 citations
JAMA Network Open
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
1.09
article

Quality of Hospices Used by Medicare Advantage and Traditional Fee-for-Service Beneficiaries

Norma B. Coe, Chuxuan Sun, Lindsay White
article en
2 citations

Abstract

These findings suggest that policymakers should consider policies for MA programs that incentivize referrals to high-quality hospices and approaches to educating beneficiaries on identifying high-quality hospice care.

JAMA Network OpenVol. 7(12)
University of Pennsylvania (US)
National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
1.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.