Distribution of Bayes’ factor

The ratio of Bayesian evidences is a popular tool in cosmology to compare different models. There are however several issues with this method: Bayes' factor depends on the prior even in the limit of noninformative priors, and the Jeffreys scale, used to assess the test, is arbitrary. Moreover, the standard use of Bayes' factor is often criticized for being unable to reject models. In this paper, we address these shortcoming by promoting evidence ratios to frequentist statistics and deriving their sampling distributions. By comparing the evidence ratios to their sampling distributions, poor fitting models can now be rejected. Our method additionally does not depend on the prior in the limit of very weak priors, thereby safeguarding the experimenter against premature rejection of a theory with a uninformative prior, and replaces the arbitrary Jeffreys scale by probability thresholds for rejection. We provide analytical solutions for some simplified cases (Gaussian data, linear parameters, and nested models), and we apply the method to cosmological supernovae Ia data. We dub our method the FB method, for frequentist-Bayesian.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2024-12-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.110.123522
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distribution of Bayes’ factor

Luca Amendola, Elena Sellentin, Z. Sakr, Kevin Wolz et al.
3 citations
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
1.04
article

Distribution of Bayes’ factor

Luca Amendola, Elena Sellentin, Z. Sakr, Kevin Wolz, Vrund Patel
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The ratio of Bayesian evidences is a popular tool in cosmology to compare different models. There are however several issues with this method: Bayes' factor depends on the prior even in the limit of noninformative priors, and the Jeffreys scale, used to assess the test, is arbitrary. Moreover, the standard use of Bayes' factor is often criticized for being unable to reject models. In this paper, we address these shortcoming by promoting evidence ratios to frequentist statistics and deriving their sampling distributions. By comparing the evidence ratios to their sampling distributions, poor fitting models can now be rejected. Our method additionally does not depend on the prior in the limit of very weak priors, thereby safeguarding the experimenter against premature rejection of a theory with a uninformative prior, and replaces the arbitrary Jeffreys scale by probability thresholds for rejection. We provide analytical solutions for some simplified cases (Gaussian data, linear parameters, and nested models), and we apply the method to cosmological supernovae Ia data. We dub our method the FB method, for frequentist-Bayesian.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 110(12)
Leiden University (NL), Heidelberg University (DE), University of Oxford (GB)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Science and Technology Facilities Council
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
1.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.