Comprehensive analysis of interpolation methods for modeling the spatial distribution of gravity anomalies

Modeling the spatial distribution of gravity anomalies requires accounting for numerous factors that influence the accuracy of results. The primary factors include the interpolation methods used to construct regular grids of gravity anomalies, as well as the distribution and number of observation points. This study compares the accuracy of various interpolation methods for gravity anomalies based on the WGM2012 model. The analysis utilized gravity anomaly data obtained from 200 GNSS stations located in Ukraine and 355 test points of a hypothetical gravimetric network. The research aimed to evaluate the accuracy of interpolation methods such as Inverse Distance to a Power, Kriging, Minimum Curvature, Moving Average, Nearest Neighbor, Polynomial Regression, and Radial Basis Function in tasks of modeling the spatial distribution of anomalies using data from the WGM2012 model. The analysis was performed based on calculated differences between interpolated and original values, supported by graphical and statistical data. The results allowed for the classification of interpolation methods by accuracy: 1) High accuracy with uniform value distribution; 2) Moderate accuracy with a balanced distribution; 3) Low accuracy with large amplitude variations. The study demonstrated that a well-founded selection of an interpolation method can significantly enhance the accuracy of modeling the spatial distribution of gravity anomalies and provide reliable results for solving geophysical problems.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
GEODESY CARTOGRAPHY AND AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23939/istcgcap2024.100.016
Primary Topic
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comprehensive analysis of interpolation methods for modeling the spatial distribution of gravity anomalies

Alina Fedorchuk
GEODESY CARTOGRAPHY AND AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
article

Comprehensive analysis of interpolation methods for modeling the spatial distribution of gravity anomalies

Alina Fedorchuk
article en

Abstract

Modeling the spatial distribution of gravity anomalies requires accounting for numerous factors that influence the accuracy of results. The primary factors include the interpolation methods used to construct regular grids of gravity anomalies, as well as the distribution and number of observation points. This study compares the accuracy of various interpolation methods for gravity anomalies based on the WGM2012 model. The analysis utilized gravity anomaly data obtained from 200 GNSS stations located in Ukraine and 355 test points of a hypothetical gravimetric network. The research aimed to evaluate the accuracy of interpolation methods such as Inverse Distance to a Power, Kriging, Minimum Curvature, Moving Average, Nearest Neighbor, Polynomial Regression, and Radial Basis Function in tasks of modeling the spatial distribution of anomalies using data from the WGM2012 model. The analysis was performed based on calculated differences between interpolated and original values, supported by graphical and statistical data. The results allowed for the classification of interpolation methods by accuracy: 1) High accuracy with uniform value distribution; 2) Moderate accuracy with a balanced distribution; 3) Low accuracy with large amplitude variations. The study demonstrated that a well-founded selection of an interpolation method can significantly enhance the accuracy of modeling the spatial distribution of gravity anomalies and provide reliable results for solving geophysical problems.

GEODESY CARTOGRAPHY AND AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.