A generative syntactic analysis of Latvian grammatical prefixes<i> jā-</i>, <i>ne-</i>

The present study explores Latvian grammatical prefixes jā-, ne-, from the generative syntactic perspective. To date, in contrast to significant research within the traditional syntactic dimension, generative syntactic studies of Latvian in general have been very limited (e.g., Apse 2007; Fábregas et al. 2018; Kushnir 2019; Biks 2020), and verbal morphosyntax is yet to become a topic of discussion. Meanwhile, the two grammatical verbal prefixes under analysis raise a number of questions, such as their incompatibility with respect to one another in Standard Latvian, their placement on the generative syntactic tree, and the non-canonical case marking in the debitive construction. To answer these questions, the present study builds on the generative theory of X-bar syntax (Chomsky 1993; 1995), Rizzi’s (1997) Split-CP hypothesis, Case Theory (Chomsky 2001), and previous findings on the Baltic verb (Korostenskiene 2017; 2022). The proposed approach to the debitive construction and accompanying non-canonical case-marking in Latvian is hoped to contribute to the existing field of research as well as to have implications for the study of clausal phenomena in Baltic languages from the generative syntactic perspective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Valoda nozīme un forma / Language Meaning and Form
Published
2024-12-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22364/vnf.15.08
Primary Topic
Linguistics and language evolution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A generative syntactic analysis of Latvian grammatical prefixes jā-, ne-

Julija Korostenskienė
Valoda nozīme un forma / Language Meaning and Form
Linguistics and language evolution
article

A generative syntactic analysis of Latvian grammatical prefixes jā-, ne-

Julija Korostenskienė
article en

Abstract

The present study explores Latvian grammatical prefixes jā-, ne-, from the generative syntactic perspective. To date, in contrast to significant research within the traditional syntactic dimension, generative syntactic studies of Latvian in general have been very limited (e.g., Apse 2007; Fábregas et al. 2018; Kushnir 2019; Biks 2020), and verbal morphosyntax is yet to become a topic of discussion. Meanwhile, the two grammatical verbal prefixes under analysis raise a number of questions, such as their incompatibility with respect to one another in Standard Latvian, their placement on the generative syntactic tree, and the non-canonical case marking in the debitive construction. To answer these questions, the present study builds on the generative theory of X-bar syntax (Chomsky 1993; 1995), Rizzi’s (1997) Split-CP hypothesis, Case Theory (Chomsky 2001), and previous findings on the Baltic verb (Korostenskiene 2017; 2022). The proposed approach to the debitive construction and accompanying non-canonical case-marking in Latvian is hoped to contribute to the existing field of research as well as to have implications for the study of clausal phenomena in Baltic languages from the generative syntactic perspective.

Valoda nozīme un forma / Language Meaning and Form
Vilnius University (LT), Institute of Foreign Languages (RU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Linguistics and language evolution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A generative syntactic analysis of Latvian grammatical prefixes<i> jā-</i>, <i>ne-</i> — Julija Korostenskienė · Valoda nozīme un forma / Language Meaning and Form (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS