Productive word-formation types of compound neologisms in the Lithuanian language
The article is dedicated to neologisms of the most productive word-formation types of nominal and adjectival compounds. The study is based on the data of the analysis of 355 compounds (244 nouns and 111 adjectives) of four word-formation types. The study of neologisms has showen that the sequence of the most productive types of nominal compounds (noun + noun, adjective + noun) remains the same as indicated in grammars. The most productive word-formation type, noun + noun, includes 70 % of nominal neologisms. Thus, this word-formation type both in the past and present is the most productive. Nouns of both word-formation types meet the requirements of word-formation. Compounds are derived with an interfix (56 %) and without it (44 %). There remains a tendency to be based on base words of simple structure (78 % of compounds are based on morphemically indivisible stems of base words). The sequence of the most productive types of adjectival compounds also remained the same: the most productive type is adjective + noun (85 % of adjectival compounds), the second most productive type is noun + noun (15 %). 89 % of compounds have an interfix. 65 % of compounds are based on base words with morphemically indivisible stems. All neologisms are based on the base words included in the dictionaries. The meanings of all neologisms become clear from a minimal or wider context. Productivity of the word-formation type and knowledge of analogical real compounds also help to understand the meaning of a compound. Many neologisms are words with a negative connotation, often they are names of persons.
Authors
- Jolanta Vaskelienė (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8516-8608)
Institutions
- Šiauliai University (LT)
- Vilnius University (LT)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Valoda nozīme un forma / Language Meaning and Form
- Published
- 2024-12-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.22364/vnf.15.14
- Primary Topic
- Lexicography and Language Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00