Sex Differences in Ependymoma Methylation by Methylation‐Defined Subgroup

Ependymoma is the second most common malignant paediatric brain tumour composed of nine methylation-defined, clinically relevant subgroups. It is unclear if there are sex differences in methylation profiles within these subgroups which could guide future treatment options. We obtained available methylation data from the National Center for Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). Differentially methylated probes (DMPs) between sexes were identified in each ependymoma sample and mapped to genes. Reactome pathways resulting from genes were identified. Survival was estimated for each sex within molecular subgroups. There were 492 cases included in the main analysis: PF-EPN-A (n = 238) PF-EPN-B (n = 52), PF-SE (n = 34), SP-MPE (n = 26), SP-EPN (n = 21), ST-EPN-RELA (n = 87), ST-EPN-YAP1 (n = 13) and ST-SE (n = 21). Females were observed to have better, but statistically nonsignificant, 5-year overall survival (OS) and better, marginally significant 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) than males. One subgroup, ST-EPN-RELA, showed significantly better OS in females. There was a difference in immune cell composition within tumour subgroups. One gene, RFTN1, was consistently differentially methylated by sex among all subgroups. There were biologic pathways identified from genes with differential methylation by sex in the following subgroups: PF-EPN-B, PF-SE, ST-EPN-RELA and ST-EPN-YAP1. Many of the identified pathways may be options for potential therapeutic targets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.70286
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sex Differences in Ependymoma Methylation by Methylation‐Defined Subgroup

Natali Sorajja, Lindsay A. Williams, Zhanni Lu, Lauren J. Mills et al.
2 citations
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
0.47
article

Sex Differences in Ependymoma Methylation by Methylation‐Defined Subgroup

Natali Sorajja, Lindsay A. Williams, Zhanni Lu, Lauren J. Mills, Shelby Mestnik
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Ependymoma is the second most common malignant paediatric brain tumour composed of nine methylation-defined, clinically relevant subgroups. It is unclear if there are sex differences in methylation profiles within these subgroups which could guide future treatment options. We obtained available methylation data from the National Center for Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). Differentially methylated probes (DMPs) between sexes were identified in each ependymoma sample and mapped to genes. Reactome pathways resulting from genes were identified. Survival was estimated for each sex within molecular subgroups. There were 492 cases included in the main analysis: PF-EPN-A (n = 238) PF-EPN-B (n = 52), PF-SE (n = 34), SP-MPE (n = 26), SP-EPN (n = 21), ST-EPN-RELA (n = 87), ST-EPN-YAP1 (n = 13) and ST-SE (n = 21). Females were observed to have better, but statistically nonsignificant, 5-year overall survival (OS) and better, marginally significant 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) than males. One subgroup, ST-EPN-RELA, showed significantly better OS in females. There was a difference in immune cell composition within tumour subgroups. One gene, RFTN1, was consistently differentially methylated by sex among all subgroups. There were biologic pathways identified from genes with differential methylation by sex in the following subgroups: PF-EPN-B, PF-SE, ST-EPN-RELA and ST-EPN-YAP1. Many of the identified pathways may be options for potential therapeutic targets.

Journal of Cellular and Molecular MedicineVol. 28(24)
Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US), University of Minnesota (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
0.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.