Plasma Exchange and Sepsis: An Opportunity to Transition from “All or Nothing” Medicine to Individualized Patient Centered Care

Abstract Sepsis remains the bread and butter of critical care medicine, but despite detailed knowledge of the pathophysiology, prospective clinical trials continue to yield disappointing results and the mortality for sepsis remains unacceptably high. Current definitions and inclusion criteria from current clinical care standards make studies very unlikely to be “positive” despite the likelihood that the studied therapies may indeed be clinically efficacious. The Society of Critical Care medicine has acknowledged these limitations and has proposed a focus on individualized management of sepsis research. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has an extensive body of literature to support its role in sepsis, but the current standards of care do not often include TPE in the management algorithm. These findings highlight current flaws in research and bedside care, while offering the opportunity to apply the recommendations of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign and improved patient care- both now and in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Intensive Care Research
Published
2024-12-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44231-024-00076-5
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Plasma Exchange and Sepsis: An Opportunity to Transition from “All or Nothing” Medicine to Individualized Patient Centered Care

Philip Keith, L. Keith Scott
Intensive Care Research
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Plasma Exchange and Sepsis: An Opportunity to Transition from “All or Nothing” Medicine to Individualized Patient Centered Care

Philip Keith, L. Keith Scott
article en

Abstract

Abstract Sepsis remains the bread and butter of critical care medicine, but despite detailed knowledge of the pathophysiology, prospective clinical trials continue to yield disappointing results and the mortality for sepsis remains unacceptably high. Current definitions and inclusion criteria from current clinical care standards make studies very unlikely to be “positive” despite the likelihood that the studied therapies may indeed be clinically efficacious. The Society of Critical Care medicine has acknowledged these limitations and has proposed a focus on individualized management of sepsis research. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has an extensive body of literature to support its role in sepsis, but the current standards of care do not often include TPE in the management algorithm. These findings highlight current flaws in research and bedside care, while offering the opportunity to apply the recommendations of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign and improved patient care- both now and in the future.

Intensive Care ResearchVol. 4(4)
Novant Health (US), Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center Shreveport (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.