Religion Welcome Here: A Pluriversal Approach to Religion and Global Bioethics

This paper sets forth and defends a pluriversal approach to religion in the context of an increasingly global bioethics. Section I introduces a pluriversal view as a normative technique for engaging across difference. A normative pluriversal approach sets five constraints: civility, change from within, justice, non-domination, and tolerance. Section II applies a pluriversal approach to religion. It argues that this approach is epistemically just, recognizes diverse standpoints, and represents a productive, preferred, way to tackle global bioethics concerns. Section II also considers an opposing viewpoint, which holds that religious perspectives have no place in bioethics. We show that this viewpoint would have adverse effects on bioethics publishing, conferencing, and training programmes. The paper concludes (in Section III) that bioethicists should engage with people who hold different worldviews, including religious worldviews, and should do so in accordance with pluriversal ethical constraints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
Published
2024-12-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-024-10410-7
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Ethics in medical practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Religion Welcome Here: A Pluriversal Approach to Religion and Global Bioethics

Caesar Atuire, Mohammed Ghaly, Nancy S. Jecker, Vina Vaswani et al.
5 citations
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
Ethics in medical practice
4.25
article

Religion Welcome Here: A Pluriversal Approach to Religion and Global Bioethics

Caesar Atuire, Mohammed Ghaly, Nancy S. Jecker, Vina Vaswani, Teck Chuan Voo, Vardit Ravitsky
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This paper sets forth and defends a pluriversal approach to religion in the context of an increasingly global bioethics. Section I introduces a pluriversal view as a normative technique for engaging across difference. A normative pluriversal approach sets five constraints: civility, change from within, justice, non-domination, and tolerance. Section II applies a pluriversal approach to religion. It argues that this approach is epistemically just, recognizes diverse standpoints, and represents a productive, preferred, way to tackle global bioethics concerns. Section II also considers an opposing viewpoint, which holds that religious perspectives have no place in bioethics. We show that this viewpoint would have adverse effects on bioethics publishing, conferencing, and training programmes. The paper concludes (in Section III) that bioethicists should engage with people who hold different worldviews, including religious worldviews, and should do so in accordance with pluriversal ethical constraints.

Journal of Bioethical InquiryVol. 22(2)
Hastings Center (US), Harvard University (US), University of Ghana (GH), SingHealth (SG), Yenepoya University (IN), Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK), University of Washington (US), University of Johannesburg (ZA), University of Oxford (GB), Hamad bin Khalifa University (QA), Harvard Global Health Institute (US)
Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Khalifa University of Science, Technology and Research, University of Johannesburg
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ethics in medical practice
4.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.