Philosophy of the Humanities: the Nature of the Humanities

One question for the burgeoning field of ‘philosophy of the humanities’ is whether there is anything that binds the humanistic disciplines together—whether the humanities ‘have a (communal) nature’. In recent years this question has received disparaging answers, for example in the work of Herman Paul. In this presentation I argue, against this disparaging answer. I argue that the humanities do have a (communal) nature, and that they are marked out by the objects they study. These objects have, in the main, three properties that the objects studied in the natural sciences lack, the properties (1) of being intentionality saturated, (2) of having meaning, and (3) of embodying value. I also indicate how the humanities differ from the social sciences. This presentation is based on my forthcoming book, that will be published by Oxford University Press, A Philosophy of the Humanities, written with Stephen Grimm (New York), and Rik Peels (Amsterdam).

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62422/978-81-970328-4-4-002
Primary Topic
Classical Philosophy and Thought
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Philosophy of the Humanities: the Nature of the Humanities

R. van Woudenberg
Classical Philosophy and Thought
article

Philosophy of the Humanities: the Nature of the Humanities

R. van Woudenberg
article en

Abstract

One question for the burgeoning field of ‘philosophy of the humanities’ is whether there is anything that binds the humanistic disciplines together—whether the humanities ‘have a (communal) nature’. In recent years this question has received disparaging answers, for example in the work of Herman Paul. In this presentation I argue, against this disparaging answer. I argue that the humanities do have a (communal) nature, and that they are marked out by the objects they study. These objects have, in the main, three properties that the objects studied in the natural sciences lack, the properties (1) of being intentionality saturated, (2) of having meaning, and (3) of embodying value. I also indicate how the humanities differ from the social sciences. This presentation is based on my forthcoming book, that will be published by Oxford University Press, A Philosophy of the Humanities, written with Stephen Grimm (New York), and Rik Peels (Amsterdam).

Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Classical Philosophy and Thought
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.