Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: does bougie size affect the outcome?

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is becoming the most popular bariatric procedure. However, no standardized technique is followed by all surgeons. especially the bougie size used when creating the sleeve. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the outcome of two different bougie sizes: 30 and 40 French) used during LSG.METHODS: We evaluated 426 patients who underwent LSG throughout the 2-year period. Group A (N.=210) used 30 Fr bougie size, while group B (N.=216) used 40 Fr bougie size.RESULTS: The mean age was (40±9.6) and 41±7.8), and Body Mass Index (BMI) was (43.2±4.7 and 42.5±5.2 kg/m2) for groups A and B, respectively, with no significant difference). The incidence of leakage, bleeding twist, vomiting, and reflux was comparable in both groups, with no significant difference. The excess weight loss percentage (EWL%) was significantly higher in group A compared to group B, at 2-year follow-up (72.7±2.9 vs. 70.3±3.7%; P<0.0001). There was no significant difference in resolution or improvement of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, or dyslipidemia.CONCLUSIONS: Our results concluded that a 30-Fr or 40-Fr bougie utilized during LSG does not significantly affect LSG complication rate, resolution, or improvement of comorbidities. The EWL% was significantly higher in patients who received 30 Fr bougie compared to patients who had 40 Fr at one and 2-year follow-up. A randomized control trial and further long-term data are recommended to ascertain this conclusion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chirurgia
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23736/s0394-9508.24.05770-x
Primary Topic
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: does bougie size affect the outcome?

Mostafa M. Sayed, Ragai Sobhi Hanna, Moayed Ibrahim
Chirurgia
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
article

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: does bougie size affect the outcome?

Mostafa M. Sayed, Ragai Sobhi Hanna, Moayed Ibrahim
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is becoming the most popular bariatric procedure. However, no standardized technique is followed by all surgeons. especially the bougie size used when creating the sleeve. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the outcome of two different bougie sizes: 30 and 40 French) used during LSG.METHODS: We evaluated 426 patients who underwent LSG throughout the 2-year period. Group A (N.=210) used 30 Fr bougie size, while group B (N.=216) used 40 Fr bougie size.RESULTS: The mean age was (40±9.6) and 41±7.8), and Body Mass Index (BMI) was (43.2±4.7 and 42.5±5.2 kg/m2) for groups A and B, respectively, with no significant difference). The incidence of leakage, bleeding twist, vomiting, and reflux was comparable in both groups, with no significant difference. The excess weight loss percentage (EWL%) was significantly higher in group A compared to group B, at 2-year follow-up (72.7±2.9 vs. 70.3±3.7%; P<0.0001). There was no significant difference in resolution or improvement of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, or dyslipidemia.CONCLUSIONS: Our results concluded that a 30-Fr or 40-Fr bougie utilized during LSG does not significantly affect LSG complication rate, resolution, or improvement of comorbidities. The EWL% was significantly higher in patients who received 30 Fr bougie compared to patients who had 40 Fr at one and 2-year follow-up. A randomized control trial and further long-term data are recommended to ascertain this conclusion.

ChirurgiaVol. 37(6)
Assiut University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.