Critical Times, Cosmopolitan Justice and the Responsiveness Rhetoric

Several crises render our times inter alia “difficult”, “viral”, “testing”, and “uncertain”. A related rhetoric of responsiveness to crises becomes globally dispersed and is commonly used by researchers, intellectuals and global publics. In this article, after some preliminary comments on the responsiveness to our times, I critique the “uncertain/critical times” responsiveness rhetoric and explore some of its prescriptions for a better future. I single out indicative pros and cons of this rhetoric and discuss the related politics of exalting recommendations such as “rethinking” the world of today within the confines of social and democratic justice. My argument is that, when meta-theoretically investigated, the ambiguities of the responsiveness rhetoric and its neglect of cosmopolitan justice raise concerns about how this rhetoric frames crises.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy International Journal
Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23880/phij-16000341
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Critical Times, Cosmopolitan Justice and the Responsiveness Rhetoric

Marianna Papastephanou
1 citations
Philosophy International Journal
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
2.23
article

Critical Times, Cosmopolitan Justice and the Responsiveness Rhetoric

Marianna Papastephanou
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Several crises render our times inter alia “difficult”, “viral”, “testing”, and “uncertain”. A related rhetoric of responsiveness to crises becomes globally dispersed and is commonly used by researchers, intellectuals and global publics. In this article, after some preliminary comments on the responsiveness to our times, I critique the “uncertain/critical times” responsiveness rhetoric and explore some of its prescriptions for a better future. I single out indicative pros and cons of this rhetoric and discuss the related politics of exalting recommendations such as “rethinking” the world of today within the confines of social and democratic justice. My argument is that, when meta-theoretically investigated, the ambiguities of the responsiveness rhetoric and its neglect of cosmopolitan justice raise concerns about how this rhetoric frames crises.

Philosophy International JournalVol. 7(4)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Global Peace and Security Dynamics
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.