Assessing thermal performance: An experimental study on U-value variability in building fabric elements
• Energy audits and performance checks are key for energy savings in buildings. • Estimating a building's U-value is essential for evaluating thermal performance. • In situ U-value measurement using heat flow meters offers valuable data. • Study provides insights into U-value assessment and its challenges. • Study reveals significant differences in U-values for similar building components. In order to achieve energy savings in existing buildings, there is an increasing need for energy audits and performance checks. In this regard, estimating a building's U-value is crucial, and there are a variety of methods available for achieving this. Heat flow meters can be used to measure U-value in situ. This research reports on an experimental campaign that evaluated the insulation and performance of the fabric elements of a building located in Dublin, Ireland. The experimental study conducted on the "Block F" building provided insights into the building's thermal performance by measuring the U-value of various windows and walls across different locations and floors. The average heat loss coefficient for windows was approximately 1.74 W/(m²K) before data cleaning and 1.99 W/(m²K) after cleaning, while walls had an average of 0.90 W/(m²K) before cleaning and 1.07 W/(m²K) after cleaning. The findings revealed that similar types of windows and wall components exhibited significantly different U-values. The study identified several challenges contributing to the variability in U-value readings within the same building.
Authors
- Philippe Lemarchand (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9759-9712)
- H Alkhatib
Institutions
- Science Foundation Ireland (IE)
- Technological University Dublin (IE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Results in Engineering
- Published
- 2024-12-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103730
- Citations
- 12
- Primary Topic
- Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.18
Funders
- Higher Education Authority