No legal barriers, no safe options: Navigating safe abortion in post-decriminalisation South Korea

Abstract On 1 January 2021, South Korea decriminalised abortion, overturning laws that had penalised women and medical practitioners since 1953. Despite this milestone, universal access to safe abortion services remains elusive. This paper investigates the post-decriminalisation abortion landscape in South Korea, focusing on how lingering legacies of state-led population control policies and developmentalist priorities continue to hinder meaningful legal and policy reforms. Abortion remains marginalised in public healthcare policies, reflecting a broader neglect of reproductive health and autonomy. Furthermore, recent legal frameworks addressing unwanted pregnancies undermine abortion rights under the guise of protecting vulnerable women in crisis pregnancies. Drawing on the ongoing struggles of reproductive justice activists in South Korea, this paper examines their efforts to push for comprehensive reforms that address systemic issues and advance sexual and reproductive health and rights.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jindal Global Law Review
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41020-024-00246-y
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

No legal barriers, no safe options: Navigating safe abortion in post-decriminalisation South Korea

Yurim Lee, Eunjin Lee
3 citations
Jindal Global Law Review
Reproductive Health and Contraception
1.63
article

No legal barriers, no safe options: Navigating safe abortion in post-decriminalisation South Korea

Yurim Lee, Eunjin Lee
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract On 1 January 2021, South Korea decriminalised abortion, overturning laws that had penalised women and medical practitioners since 1953. Despite this milestone, universal access to safe abortion services remains elusive. This paper investigates the post-decriminalisation abortion landscape in South Korea, focusing on how lingering legacies of state-led population control policies and developmentalist priorities continue to hinder meaningful legal and policy reforms. Abortion remains marginalised in public healthcare policies, reflecting a broader neglect of reproductive health and autonomy. Furthermore, recent legal frameworks addressing unwanted pregnancies undermine abortion rights under the guise of protecting vulnerable women in crisis pregnancies. Drawing on the ongoing struggles of reproductive justice activists in South Korea, this paper examines their efforts to push for comprehensive reforms that address systemic issues and advance sexual and reproductive health and rights.

Jindal Global Law ReviewVol. 15(2)
UCLA Health (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
1.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.