Sistem Pembuktian Pidana Pada Pelanggaran Hukum Lingkungan di Indonesia

The enforcement of criminal law against environmental violations in Indonesia faces significant challenges, particularly in the effectiveness of the evidence-gathering system. The conventional system, which places the burden of proof entirely on prosecutors, often falls short in addressing complex environmental cases, especially those involving large corporations. Cases like water pollution and illegal logging require complex scientific evidence, such as laboratory analyses and satellite imagery, which are difficult to obtain. This article explores reverse proof systems, where defendants must prove their innocence, although this approach raises concerns about presumption of innocence principles. A risk-based approach is also discussed, prioritizing cases with significant environmental impacts. Technologies like automated sensors and real-time data analysis can enhance evidence collection, but their implementation is limited by infrastructure, budget constraints, and technical skills. The article recommends improving law enforcement capacity, stricter regulations, and leveraging technology to strengthen environmental law enforcemen.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JURNAL SOSIAL EKONOMI DAN HUMANIORA
Published
2024-09-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29303/jseh.v10i3.675
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Legal and Policy Analysis in Indonesia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.07
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sistem Pembuktian Pidana Pada Pelanggaran Hukum Lingkungan di Indonesia

Muhammad Jailani, M. Faisal
1 citations
JURNAL SOSIAL EKONOMI DAN HUMANIORA
Legal and Policy Analysis in Indonesia
4.07
article

Sistem Pembuktian Pidana Pada Pelanggaran Hukum Lingkungan di Indonesia

Muhammad Jailani, M. Faisal
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The enforcement of criminal law against environmental violations in Indonesia faces significant challenges, particularly in the effectiveness of the evidence-gathering system. The conventional system, which places the burden of proof entirely on prosecutors, often falls short in addressing complex environmental cases, especially those involving large corporations. Cases like water pollution and illegal logging require complex scientific evidence, such as laboratory analyses and satellite imagery, which are difficult to obtain. This article explores reverse proof systems, where defendants must prove their innocence, although this approach raises concerns about presumption of innocence principles. A risk-based approach is also discussed, prioritizing cases with significant environmental impacts. Technologies like automated sensors and real-time data analysis can enhance evidence collection, but their implementation is limited by infrastructure, budget constraints, and technical skills. The article recommends improving law enforcement capacity, stricter regulations, and leveraging technology to strengthen environmental law enforcemen.

JURNAL SOSIAL EKONOMI DAN HUMANIORAVol. 10(3)
University of Mataram (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Legal and Policy Analysis in Indonesia
4.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.