How to Get Away with Murder: Unknowing and Subversion in Shirley Jackson’s <i>We Have Always Lived in the Castle</i>

This article considers what various forms of unknowing make possible in Shirley Jackson’s novel We Have Always Lived in the Castle. Combining Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick’s concept of the “privilege of unknowing” with close reading, I show how Merricat Blackwood, the novel’s narrator-protagonist, has a habit of repelling knowledge in her narration. I argue that this tendency allows her to evade accountability for the murders she committed as a child. Furthermore, I point to the queer potential of the narrator’s unknowingness, as she also circumvents gender norms and compulsory heterosexuality. The narrator’s refusal to recognize her own transgressions ultimately means that her subversion can linger beyond the narrative conclusion. Overall, I demonstrate that reading We Have Always Lived in the Castle with an emphasis on what Sedgwick terms the “privilege of unknowing” can help us understand how the novel generates readerly sympathy for or identification with its narrator, despite her murderous acts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critique Studies in Contemporary Fiction
Published
2024-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00111619.2024.2440529
Primary Topic
Gothic Literature and Media Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to Get Away with Murder: Unknowing and Subversion in Shirley Jackson’s We Have Always Lived in the Castle

Anna M. Young
Critique Studies in Contemporary Fiction
Gothic Literature and Media Analysis
article

How to Get Away with Murder: Unknowing and Subversion in Shirley Jackson’s We Have Always Lived in the Castle

Anna M. Young
article en

Abstract

This article considers what various forms of unknowing make possible in Shirley Jackson’s novel We Have Always Lived in the Castle. Combining Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick’s concept of the “privilege of unknowing” with close reading, I show how Merricat Blackwood, the novel’s narrator-protagonist, has a habit of repelling knowledge in her narration. I argue that this tendency allows her to evade accountability for the murders she committed as a child. Furthermore, I point to the queer potential of the narrator’s unknowingness, as she also circumvents gender norms and compulsory heterosexuality. The narrator’s refusal to recognize her own transgressions ultimately means that her subversion can linger beyond the narrative conclusion. Overall, I demonstrate that reading We Have Always Lived in the Castle with an emphasis on what Sedgwick terms the “privilege of unknowing” can help us understand how the novel generates readerly sympathy for or identification with its narrator, despite her murderous acts.

Critique Studies in Contemporary FictionVol. 67(1)
University of Oslo (NO)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Gothic Literature and Media Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How to Get Away with Murder: Unknowing and Subversion in Shirley Jackson’s <i>We Have Always Lived in the Castle</i> — Anna M. Young · Critique Studies in Contemporary Fiction (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS