Does Lower Psychological Need Satisfaction Foster Conspiracy Belief? Longitudinal Effects Over 3 Years in New Zealand

Although conspiracy belief may arise from a frustration of psychological needs, research has yet to investigate these relationships over time. Using four annual waves of longitudinal panel data in New Zealand (2019-2022; <i>N</i> = 55,269), we examined the relationship between four psychological needs (namely belonging, control, meaning in life, and self-esteem) and conspiracy belief. Results from four random-intercept cross-lagged panel models reveal stable between-person effects indicating that those whose core needs are less satisfied tend to exhibit higher levels of conspiracy belief across time. Within-person analyses further identify small cross-lagged effects within individuals: <i>decreases</i> in levels of control and belonging, as well as <i>increases</i> in levels of meaning in life, temporally precede increases in conspiracy belief. Within-person fluctuations in conspiracy belief also have negative cross-lagged associations with control (but not with the three other needs). These data provide novel insights into the psychological factors that foster conspiracy belief.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2024-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672241292841
Citations
13
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
14.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Lower Psychological Need Satisfaction Foster Conspiracy Belief? Longitudinal Effects Over 3 Years in New Zealand

Aleksandra Cichocka, Danny Osborne, John R. Kerr, Mathew D. Marques et al.
13 citations
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Misinformation and Its Impacts
14.72
article

Does Lower Psychological Need Satisfaction Foster Conspiracy Belief? Longitudinal Effects Over 3 Years in New Zealand

Aleksandra Cichocka, Danny Osborne, John R. Kerr, Mathew D. Marques, Marc Wilson, Elianne A. Albath, Rainer Greifeneder, Chris G. Sibley, Karen M. Douglas
article en
13 citations

Abstract

Although conspiracy belief may arise from a frustration of psychological needs, research has yet to investigate these relationships over time. Using four annual waves of longitudinal panel data in New Zealand (2019-2022; <i>N</i> = 55,269), we examined the relationship between four psychological needs (namely belonging, control, meaning in life, and self-esteem) and conspiracy belief. Results from four random-intercept cross-lagged panel models reveal stable between-person effects indicating that those whose core needs are less satisfied tend to exhibit higher levels of conspiracy belief across time. Within-person analyses further identify small cross-lagged effects within individuals: <i>decreases</i> in levels of control and belonging, as well as <i>increases</i> in levels of meaning in life, temporally precede increases in conspiracy belief. Within-person fluctuations in conspiracy belief also have negative cross-lagged associations with control (but not with the three other needs). These data provide novel insights into the psychological factors that foster conspiracy belief.

Personality and Social Psychology BulletinVol. 52(4)
University of Auckland (NZ), University of Basel (CH), La Trobe University (AU), University of Kent (GB), Victoria University of Wellington (NZ), University of Otago (NZ)
Freiwillige Akademische Gesellschaft, Templeton Religion Trust
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
14.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.