Can biostimulants and tillage rotations improve dryland crop productivity and soil microbes?

Abstract Soil microbes are essential for soil nutrient cycling. However, frequent tillage and the use of synthetic agrochemicals can reduce soil microbial diversity and enzyme activity. In this study, the effects of four tillage treatments (mouldboard plough, shallow tine‐tillage, no‐tillage, and tillage rotation) and two rates of synthetic agrochemicals (standard and reduced, with biostimulants) on soil microbial diversity and enzyme activity were investigated between 2018 and 2020 in a Mediterranean climate zone in South Africa. It was hypothesized that a reduction in tillage frequency and quantity of synthetic agrochemical application would lead to greater microbial diversity and enzyme activity. Soil samples were collected from the 0‐ to 150‐mm layer of a field trial under a dryland crop rotation system. Soil microbial species richness and abundance were assessed using the Shannon–Wiener diversity and evenness indices. The activities of four microbial enzymes—β‐glucosidase, acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase, and urease—were used to evaluate ecosystem functioning. The combined effects of tillage rotation with a shallow tine implement and the application of biostimulants failed to significantly improve soil microbial diversity, enzyme activity, and crop productivity relative to other treatments. However, the combination did not reduce the wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) grain yield and quality, and soil biological parameters. Furthermore, the less intensive tillage treatments, ST, NT, and ST‐NT‐NT‐NT, resulted in higher enzyme activity than the mouldboard treatment. Therefore, we suggest that combining non‐intensive tillage with reduced synthetic agrochemical use can be a safer, more environmentally friendly alternative to intensive tillage and high agrochemical application in dryland cropping systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agronomy Journal
Published
2024-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.21738
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can biostimulants and tillage rotations improve dryland crop productivity and soil microbes?

Francis Rayns, Flackson Tshuma, Stephan van der Westhuizen, James Bennett et al.
Agronomy Journal
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
article

Can biostimulants and tillage rotations improve dryland crop productivity and soil microbes?

Francis Rayns, Flackson Tshuma, Stephan van der Westhuizen, James Bennett, Johan Labuschagne, Pieter A. Swanepoel
article en

Abstract

Abstract Soil microbes are essential for soil nutrient cycling. However, frequent tillage and the use of synthetic agrochemicals can reduce soil microbial diversity and enzyme activity. In this study, the effects of four tillage treatments (mouldboard plough, shallow tine‐tillage, no‐tillage, and tillage rotation) and two rates of synthetic agrochemicals (standard and reduced, with biostimulants) on soil microbial diversity and enzyme activity were investigated between 2018 and 2020 in a Mediterranean climate zone in South Africa. It was hypothesized that a reduction in tillage frequency and quantity of synthetic agrochemical application would lead to greater microbial diversity and enzyme activity. Soil samples were collected from the 0‐ to 150‐mm layer of a field trial under a dryland crop rotation system. Soil microbial species richness and abundance were assessed using the Shannon–Wiener diversity and evenness indices. The activities of four microbial enzymes—β‐glucosidase, acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase, and urease—were used to evaluate ecosystem functioning. The combined effects of tillage rotation with a shallow tine implement and the application of biostimulants failed to significantly improve soil microbial diversity, enzyme activity, and crop productivity relative to other treatments. However, the combination did not reduce the wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) grain yield and quality, and soil biological parameters. Furthermore, the less intensive tillage treatments, ST, NT, and ST‐NT‐NT‐NT, resulted in higher enzyme activity than the mouldboard treatment. Therefore, we suggest that combining non‐intensive tillage with reduced synthetic agrochemical use can be a safer, more environmentally friendly alternative to intensive tillage and high agrochemical application in dryland cropping systems.

Agronomy JournalVol. 117(1)
Stellenbosch University (ZA), Coventry University (GB)
Coventry University, Universiteit Stellenbosch, National Outstanding Youth Science Fund Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.