The Role of Administrative Judiciary in Confronting Electronic Corruption: A Study in Comparative Legislation for Sustainable Development Goals

Objective: The purpose of the article is to determine what role administrative proceedings play in combating electronic corruption for sustainable development goals. Theoretical Framework: By strengthening legal provisions, investing in technology and expertise, ensuring judicial independence, and fostering international collaboration, countries can enhance the effectiveness of their administrative judiciaries. Method: The research methodology involves the application of the TOPSIS method. To evaluate and rank the administrative judicial systems of Jordan, Egypt, and Turkey based on their effectiveness in confronting electronic corruption using the TOPSIS method. Results and Discussion: The results of modelling and evaluation are presented. The TOPSIS method provides a quantitative approach to evaluate the effectiveness of administrative judicial systems in confronting electronic corruption. By analyzing multiple criteria, policymakers can identify strengths and weaknesses within their systems and implement targeted reforms. Research Implications: These insights not only validate the study's findings but also provide a comprehensive understanding of the multifaceted strategies required to enhance the effectiveness of administrative judiciary systems in the digital age. Originality/Value: Need to note that electronic corruption is evolving rapidly; continuous updates to laws and practices are necessary. The analysis does not account for all socio-political nuances that may affect the judicial systems.