Using Bloom’s Taxonomy to Evaluate HOTS in the Tasks of the Chinese Grade 7 English Textbook

This study evaluates the cognitive demands of tasks in the Chinese Layman’s Edition Grade 7 English textbook using Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy. The primary objective is to assess the distribution of lower-order thinking skills (LOTS) and higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) across the textbook’s tasks. Six cognitive categories were identified through a content analysis of 224 tasks: Remembering, Understanding, Applying, Analyzing, Evaluating, and Creating. The findings show that just 26.7% of activities concentrate on HOTS, such as Analyzing, Evaluating, and Creating, whereas 73.3% of tasks concentrate on LOTS, especially in Understanding and Applying. This disparity implies that fundamental cognitive abilities are being overemphasized, which is preventing children from engaging in critical analysis, evaluation, and innovation. The study emphasizes the need for textbook changes that support students' cognitive growth and are in line with contemporary educational objectives by better integrating HOTS-oriented tasks. Recommendations for curriculum enhancement and instructional strategies are provided to better prepare students for real-world challenges through more complex cognitive engagement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Education Humanities and Social Sciences
Published
2024-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54097/vxdb4505
Primary Topic
Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using Bloom’s Taxonomy to Evaluate HOTS in the Tasks of the Chinese Grade 7 English Textbook

Yi Hong
Journal of Education Humanities and Social Sciences
Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
article

Using Bloom’s Taxonomy to Evaluate HOTS in the Tasks of the Chinese Grade 7 English Textbook

Yi Hong
article en

Abstract

This study evaluates the cognitive demands of tasks in the Chinese Layman’s Edition Grade 7 English textbook using Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy. The primary objective is to assess the distribution of lower-order thinking skills (LOTS) and higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) across the textbook’s tasks. Six cognitive categories were identified through a content analysis of 224 tasks: Remembering, Understanding, Applying, Analyzing, Evaluating, and Creating. The findings show that just 26.7% of activities concentrate on HOTS, such as Analyzing, Evaluating, and Creating, whereas 73.3% of tasks concentrate on LOTS, especially in Understanding and Applying. This disparity implies that fundamental cognitive abilities are being overemphasized, which is preventing children from engaging in critical analysis, evaluation, and innovation. The study emphasizes the need for textbook changes that support students' cognitive growth and are in line with contemporary educational objectives by better integrating HOTS-oriented tasks. Recommendations for curriculum enhancement and instructional strategies are provided to better prepare students for real-world challenges through more complex cognitive engagement.

Journal of Education Humanities and Social SciencesVol. 42
Zhejiang Normal University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.