O072 Sex-based differences in pain perception with short sleep: an experimental study in healthy individuals

Abstract Introduction Experimental sleep deprivation has been shown to induce pain hypersensitivity, with more pronounced impacts on females than males. However, whether the effect of chronic short sleep on pain perception differs between sexes is unclear. This study investigated the effects of chronic self-reported short sleep (<6 hrs) on pain perception in males and females. Methods Objective sleep data were collected using a Somfit device. Quantitative sensory testing, including heat, cold, and pressure pain thresholds, temporal summation and conditioned pain modulation of pain, was conducted in the morning following sleep monitoring to measure pain perception. Results The study included 25 healthy participants (15 females) with an average age of 23.16±4.8. Both sexes exhibited similar (short) total sleep times (TST: Males: 232.4 ± 14.9 minutes vs. Females: 244.7 ± 11.7 minutes; p = 0.52). However, females experienced significantly longer REM latency, as compared to males (Males: 62.5 ± 14 minutes vs. Females: 101.1 ± 11.5 minutes; p=.04). All other sleep stages were comparable between sexes (p > 0.05). A General Linear Model revealed significant sex-based differences in pain perception between males and females (F = 5.1; B = 0.66; power = 0.97; p = 0.002), primarily driven by conditioned pain modulation (mean difference = 98.77 ± 33.9; 95% CI: 28.6 to 168.89; p = 0.008). Discussion These preliminary results suggest that short sleeping females have a dysfunctional pain suppressive response, while sleep-deprived males exhibited stronger pain inhibitory response, despite similar (low) sleep amounts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SLEEP Advances
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpae070.072
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

O072 Sex-based differences in pain perception with short sleep: an experimental study in healthy individuals

S Rouhi, Amy S. Jordan, N Egorova Brumley
SLEEP Advances
Pain Management and Placebo Effect
article

O072 Sex-based differences in pain perception with short sleep: an experimental study in healthy individuals

S Rouhi, Amy S. Jordan, N Egorova Brumley
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Experimental sleep deprivation has been shown to induce pain hypersensitivity, with more pronounced impacts on females than males. However, whether the effect of chronic short sleep on pain perception differs between sexes is unclear. This study investigated the effects of chronic self-reported short sleep (<6 hrs) on pain perception in males and females. Methods Objective sleep data were collected using a Somfit device. Quantitative sensory testing, including heat, cold, and pressure pain thresholds, temporal summation and conditioned pain modulation of pain, was conducted in the morning following sleep monitoring to measure pain perception. Results The study included 25 healthy participants (15 females) with an average age of 23.16±4.8. Both sexes exhibited similar (short) total sleep times (TST: Males: 232.4 ± 14.9 minutes vs. Females: 244.7 ± 11.7 minutes; p = 0.52). However, females experienced significantly longer REM latency, as compared to males (Males: 62.5 ± 14 minutes vs. Females: 101.1 ± 11.5 minutes; p=.04). All other sleep stages were comparable between sexes (p > 0.05). A General Linear Model revealed significant sex-based differences in pain perception between males and females (F = 5.1; B = 0.66; power = 0.97; p = 0.002), primarily driven by conditioned pain modulation (mean difference = 98.77 ± 33.9; 95% CI: 28.6 to 168.89; p = 0.008). Discussion These preliminary results suggest that short sleeping females have a dysfunctional pain suppressive response, while sleep-deprived males exhibited stronger pain inhibitory response, despite similar (low) sleep amounts.

SLEEP AdvancesVol. 5(Supplement_1)
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Pain Management and Placebo Effect
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.