O026 Within-subject variation in circadian timing in shift workers repeating the same shift patternn

Abstract Introduction While inter-individual variation in circadian response to shift work has been demonstrated, the within-individual variation across repeated roster patterns is unknown. This study aims to examine the consistency in circadian timing during repeated occasions of the same shift pattern. Methods In an ongoing study, shift workers (n=24, age 36.79±8.83 years, 8 females) from multiple industries were monitored during two replications of their usual shift patterns, separated by at least 6 weeks. Shifts included consecutive night shifts, consecutive early morning shifts, and early-morning-to-night rotations. Participants completed daily sleep diaries and wore an activity monitor to measure sleep, and a light sensor to measure light exposure. Circadian phase was assessed at the end of each shift pattern via 6-sulphatoxymelatonin (aMT6s) acrophase (peak) in urine. Results Preliminary analyses (n=15) showed considerable within-subject variability in aMT6s acrophase at the end of each shift patterns. Mean difference in acrophase was 2.06±1.36 h (range 0.15-5.22 h). Individuals working consecutive night shifts demonstrate larger variation in acrophase (3.43±1.58 h; range 1.50-5.22 h), compared to those working consecutive morning (2.01±0.69 h, range 1.18-2.86 h) or early morning-to-night shifts (1.30±0.95 h, range 0.15-2.95 h). The mediating role of individual light exposure patterns in the variation in aMT6s acrophase will be presented. Discussion Preliminary findings highlight inconsistency in circadian phase within individual shift workers, possibly associated with variation in socially-driven behaviours. Further factors influencing variability in circadian timing, i.e., individual light exposure, will be examined, to support prediction of circadian timing for informing personalised interventions for shift workers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SLEEP Advances
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpae070.026
Primary Topic
Spaceflight effects on biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

O026 Within-subject variation in circadian timing in shift workers repeating the same shift patternn

Lin Shen, S. A. Knock, Yong Ji, Elise R. Facer‐Childs et al.
SLEEP Advances
Spaceflight effects on biology
article

O026 Within-subject variation in circadian timing in shift workers repeating the same shift patternn

Lin Shen, S. A. Knock, Yong Ji, Elise R. Facer‐Childs, Mark E. Howard, Yong Zhong, Tracey L. Sletten, J. Stone, Svetlana Postnova, Shantha M. W. Rajaratnam
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction While inter-individual variation in circadian response to shift work has been demonstrated, the within-individual variation across repeated roster patterns is unknown. This study aims to examine the consistency in circadian timing during repeated occasions of the same shift pattern. Methods In an ongoing study, shift workers (n=24, age 36.79±8.83 years, 8 females) from multiple industries were monitored during two replications of their usual shift patterns, separated by at least 6 weeks. Shifts included consecutive night shifts, consecutive early morning shifts, and early-morning-to-night rotations. Participants completed daily sleep diaries and wore an activity monitor to measure sleep, and a light sensor to measure light exposure. Circadian phase was assessed at the end of each shift pattern via 6-sulphatoxymelatonin (aMT6s) acrophase (peak) in urine. Results Preliminary analyses (n=15) showed considerable within-subject variability in aMT6s acrophase at the end of each shift patterns. Mean difference in acrophase was 2.06±1.36 h (range 0.15-5.22 h). Individuals working consecutive night shifts demonstrate larger variation in acrophase (3.43±1.58 h; range 1.50-5.22 h), compared to those working consecutive morning (2.01±0.69 h, range 1.18-2.86 h) or early morning-to-night shifts (1.30±0.95 h, range 0.15-2.95 h). The mediating role of individual light exposure patterns in the variation in aMT6s acrophase will be presented. Discussion Preliminary findings highlight inconsistency in circadian phase within individual shift workers, possibly associated with variation in socially-driven behaviours. Further factors influencing variability in circadian timing, i.e., individual light exposure, will be examined, to support prediction of circadian timing for informing personalised interventions for shift workers.

SLEEP AdvancesVol. 5(Supplement_1)
The University of Sydney (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Institute for Breathing and Sleep (AU), Austin Health (AU), Monash University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Spaceflight effects on biology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.