Endophyte effects on drought tolerance of turf‐type tall fescue

Abstract The response of tall fescue [ Schedonorus arundinaceus (Schreb.) Dumort.], infected with fungal endophytes, and subjected to drought stress has varied, presumably due to variability in host–endophyte associations. Much of this research has focused on forage ecotypes; less is known about the effects of endophytes on managed turfgrasses. The objective of these trials was to determine if the presence of fungal endophytes in turf‐type tall fescue provides an advantage to the host grass when exposed to drought conditions. Five endophyte‐free and endophyte‐infected field populations were established in Fayetteville, AR, and Albany, OR. A greenhouse trial was also established in Albany. Turf was subjected to drought and lightbox photos were evaluated to determine days until 75%, 50%, and 25% green cover. Overall, endophyte infection had no consistent effect on the drought response of tall fescue. Although there was no effect on drought response, endophyte infection in turf may confer other benefits, and may still be a valuable tool for turfgrass management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crop Forage & Turfgrass Management
Published
2024-09-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cft2.20310
Primary Topic
Plant and fungal interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Endophyte effects on drought tolerance of turf‐type tall fescue

Margaret E. Secks, Douglas E. Karcher, Michael D. Richardson, Debra Hignight et al.
Crop Forage & Turfgrass Management
Plant and fungal interactions
article

Endophyte effects on drought tolerance of turf‐type tall fescue

Margaret E. Secks, Douglas E. Karcher, Michael D. Richardson, Debra Hignight, Paige Boyle, Kenneth Hignight
article en

Abstract

Abstract The response of tall fescue [ Schedonorus arundinaceus (Schreb.) Dumort.], infected with fungal endophytes, and subjected to drought stress has varied, presumably due to variability in host–endophyte associations. Much of this research has focused on forage ecotypes; less is known about the effects of endophytes on managed turfgrasses. The objective of these trials was to determine if the presence of fungal endophytes in turf‐type tall fescue provides an advantage to the host grass when exposed to drought conditions. Five endophyte‐free and endophyte‐infected field populations were established in Fayetteville, AR, and Albany, OR. A greenhouse trial was also established in Albany. Turf was subjected to drought and lightbox photos were evaluated to determine days until 75%, 50%, and 25% green cover. Overall, endophyte infection had no consistent effect on the drought response of tall fescue. Although there was no effect on drought response, endophyte infection in turf may confer other benefits, and may still be a valuable tool for turfgrass management.

Crop Forage & Turfgrass ManagementVol. 10(2)
Utah State University (US), The Ohio State University (US), University of Arkansas at Fayetteville (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Plant and fungal interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.