O034 Development and Evaluation of Two Non-Invasive Approaches for Estimating Breath-by-Breath Ventilatory Drive in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients

Abstract Introduction Estimation of breath-by-breath ventilatory drive is an important step in quantifying key obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) endotypes. However, the gold-standard for measuring ventilatory drive requires invasive instrumentation. Here, we extend two published methods for estimating breath-by-breath ventilatory drive non-invasively from polysomnography. Methods We retrospectively analysed sleep studies of 33 OSA patients (apnea-hypopnea index>5) who underwent a clinical in-lab polysomnography with the addition of intraoesophageal diaphragmatic electromyography (Edi). The ventilatory drive was estimated on a breath-by-breath basis using two independent methods: (a) a flow-shape-based machine learning approach (Flow-Drive method), Mann et al 2019 ERJ; and (b) a chemoreflex model-based approach (Loop-gain method), Terrill et al 2014 ERJ. The Spearman’s rank correlation (ρ) between the two estimated breath-by-breath ventilatory drive signals and Edi (gold-standard) was calculated: (i) for 7-min overlapping windows throughout the night for each individual; and (ii) an overnight ensemble average of obstructive respiratory events at onset and termination periods (three breaths before and after event onset and termination respectively). Results The Spearman’s ρ in the 7-minute window was similar between the Flow-Drive and Loop-gain methods, and Edi [0.40(0.10)vs.0.27(0.13), mean(SD)]. Flow-Drive and Loop-gain methods both showed similar Spearman’s ρ with Edi at event onset [0.69(0.34)vs.0.69(0.25) respectively]. At event termination, the Loop-gain method [0.85(0.13)] was more strongly correlated with Edi than the Flow-Drive method [0.78(0.30)]. Conclusions These promising results set a foundation for integrating the advantages of a machine learning approach and a physiological model-based approach in a unified method to improve the non-invasive estimation of breath-by-breath ventilatory drive.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SLEEP Advances
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sleepadvances/zpae070.034
Primary Topic
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

O034 Development and Evaluation of Two Non-Invasive Approaches for Estimating Breath-by-Breath Ventilatory Drive in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients

J Zhang, D Mann, T Leppänen, SA Sands et al.
SLEEP Advances
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
article

O034 Development and Evaluation of Two Non-Invasive Approaches for Estimating Breath-by-Breath Ventilatory Drive in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients

J Zhang, D Mann, T Leppänen, SA Sands, Philip I. Terrill
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Estimation of breath-by-breath ventilatory drive is an important step in quantifying key obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) endotypes. However, the gold-standard for measuring ventilatory drive requires invasive instrumentation. Here, we extend two published methods for estimating breath-by-breath ventilatory drive non-invasively from polysomnography. Methods We retrospectively analysed sleep studies of 33 OSA patients (apnea-hypopnea index>5) who underwent a clinical in-lab polysomnography with the addition of intraoesophageal diaphragmatic electromyography (Edi). The ventilatory drive was estimated on a breath-by-breath basis using two independent methods: (a) a flow-shape-based machine learning approach (Flow-Drive method), Mann et al 2019 ERJ; and (b) a chemoreflex model-based approach (Loop-gain method), Terrill et al 2014 ERJ. The Spearman’s rank correlation (ρ) between the two estimated breath-by-breath ventilatory drive signals and Edi (gold-standard) was calculated: (i) for 7-min overlapping windows throughout the night for each individual; and (ii) an overnight ensemble average of obstructive respiratory events at onset and termination periods (three breaths before and after event onset and termination respectively). Results The Spearman’s ρ in the 7-minute window was similar between the Flow-Drive and Loop-gain methods, and Edi [0.40(0.10)vs.0.27(0.13), mean(SD)]. Flow-Drive and Loop-gain methods both showed similar Spearman’s ρ with Edi at event onset [0.69(0.34)vs.0.69(0.25) respectively]. At event termination, the Loop-gain method [0.85(0.13)] was more strongly correlated with Edi than the Flow-Drive method [0.78(0.30)]. Conclusions These promising results set a foundation for integrating the advantages of a machine learning approach and a physiological model-based approach in a unified method to improve the non-invasive estimation of breath-by-breath ventilatory drive.

SLEEP AdvancesVol. 5(Supplement_1)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), The University of Queensland (AU), University of Eastern Finland (FI), Kuopio University Hospital (FI), Circadian (United States) (US), Imaging Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.