Room Temperature Hydrogen Atom Scattering Experiments Are Not a Sufficient Benchmark to Validate Electronic Friction Theory

In the dynamics of atoms and molecules at metal surfaces, electron-hole pair excitations can play a crucial role. In the case of hyperthermal hydrogen atom scattering, they lead to nonadiabatic energy loss and highly inelastic scattering. Molecular dynamics with electronic friction simulation results, based on an isotropic homogeneous electron gas approximation, have previously aligned well with measured kinetic energy loss distributions, indicating that this level of theoretical description is sufficient to describe nonadiabatic effects during scattering. In this study, we demonstrate that friction derived from density functional theory linear response calculations can also describe the experimental energy loss distributions, although agreement is slightly worse than for the simpler isotropic homogeneous electron gas approximation. We show that the apparent agreement of the homogeneous electron gas approximation with experiment arises from a fortuitous cancellation of errors as friction is overestimated close to the surface and the spin transition is neglected. Differences in frictional treatment affect single, double, and multibounce scattering trajectories in distinct ways, altering the shape of low-temperature energy loss distributions. These distinctions are largely absent at room temperature but may be measurable in future low-temperature scattering experiments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
Published
2024-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c02468
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Room Temperature Hydrogen Atom Scattering Experiments Are Not a Sufficient Benchmark to Validate Electronic Friction Theory

Reinhard J. Maurer, Nils Hertl, Wojciech G. Stark, Connor L. Box
3 citations
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
1.01
article

Room Temperature Hydrogen Atom Scattering Experiments Are Not a Sufficient Benchmark to Validate Electronic Friction Theory

Reinhard J. Maurer, Nils Hertl, Wojciech G. Stark, Connor L. Box
article en
3 citations

Abstract

In the dynamics of atoms and molecules at metal surfaces, electron-hole pair excitations can play a crucial role. In the case of hyperthermal hydrogen atom scattering, they lead to nonadiabatic energy loss and highly inelastic scattering. Molecular dynamics with electronic friction simulation results, based on an isotropic homogeneous electron gas approximation, have previously aligned well with measured kinetic energy loss distributions, indicating that this level of theoretical description is sufficient to describe nonadiabatic effects during scattering. In this study, we demonstrate that friction derived from density functional theory linear response calculations can also describe the experimental energy loss distributions, although agreement is slightly worse than for the simpler isotropic homogeneous electron gas approximation. We show that the apparent agreement of the homogeneous electron gas approximation with experiment arises from a fortuitous cancellation of errors as friction is overestimated close to the surface and the spin transition is neglected. Differences in frictional treatment affect single, double, and multibounce scattering trajectories in distinct ways, altering the shape of low-temperature energy loss distributions. These distinctions are largely absent at room temperature but may be measurable in future low-temperature scattering experiments.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry LettersVol. 15(51)
University of Warwick (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
1.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.