Power and Opposition in Russia in 1914–February 1917: Why Did the Dialogue Not Take Place?

The article is devoted to the political interaction of the supreme power, government circles, and the public during the First World War (before February 1917). The issues of the formation of this interaction on the eve of the war, development in the mainstream of the “sacred union” of 1914, “patriotic anxiety” of 1915, “parallelism of actions” of 1916, and the “storm of power” at the turn of 1916–1917 are considered. The author comes to the conclusion that the supreme power and the government as a whole were inclined to an agreement, striving to maintain national unity during the war. The public increased its demands, considering its domestic political tasks more important than foreign policies. The split of the elites became an important reason for the February Revolution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s1019331624700059
Citations
1
Primary Topic
International Relations and Foreign Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Power and Opposition in Russia in 1914–February 1917: Why Did the Dialogue Not Take Place?

Федор Александрович Гайда
1 citations
Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences
International Relations and Foreign Policy
2.23
article

Power and Opposition in Russia in 1914–February 1917: Why Did the Dialogue Not Take Place?

Федор Александрович Гайда
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The article is devoted to the political interaction of the supreme power, government circles, and the public during the First World War (before February 1917). The issues of the formation of this interaction on the eve of the war, development in the mainstream of the “sacred union” of 1914, “patriotic anxiety” of 1915, “parallelism of actions” of 1916, and the “storm of power” at the turn of 1916–1917 are considered. The author comes to the conclusion that the supreme power and the government as a whole were inclined to an agreement, striving to maintain national unity during the war. The public increased its demands, considering its domestic political tasks more important than foreign policies. The split of the elites became an important reason for the February Revolution.

Herald of the Russian Academy of SciencesVol. 94(S1)
National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU), Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
International Relations and Foreign Policy
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Power and Opposition in Russia in 1914–February 1917: Why Did the Dialogue Not Take Place? — Федор Александрович Гайда · Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS