Costs of Financing U.S. Federal Debt Under a Gold Standard: 1791-1933

Abstract From a new data set, we infer time series of term structures of yields on U.S. federal bonds during the gold standard era from 1791–1933 and use our estimates to reassess historical narratives about how the United States expanded its fiscal capacity. We show that U.S. debt carried a default risk premium until the end of the nineteenth century, when it started being priced as an alternative safe asset to U.K. debt. During the Civil War, investors expected the United States to return to a gold standard so the federal government was able to borrow without facing denomination risk. After the introduction of the National Banking System, the slope of the yield curve switched from down to up and the premium on U.S. debt with maturity less than one year disappeared.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjae028
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.97
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Costs of Financing U.S. Federal Debt Under a Gold Standard: 1791-1933

Thomas J. Sargent, George Hall, Bálint Szőke, Jonathan Payne
8 citations
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
4.97
article

Costs of Financing U.S. Federal Debt Under a Gold Standard: 1791-1933

Thomas J. Sargent, George Hall, Bálint Szőke, Jonathan Payne
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Abstract From a new data set, we infer time series of term structures of yields on U.S. federal bonds during the gold standard era from 1791–1933 and use our estimates to reassess historical narratives about how the United States expanded its fiscal capacity. We show that U.S. debt carried a default risk premium until the end of the nineteenth century, when it started being priced as an alternative safe asset to U.K. debt. During the Civil War, investors expected the United States to return to a gold standard so the federal government was able to borrow without facing denomination risk. After the introduction of the National Banking System, the slope of the yield curve switched from down to up and the premium on U.S. debt with maturity less than one year disappeared.

The Quarterly Journal of EconomicsVol. 140(1)
Hoover Institution (US), Princeton University (US), Federal Reserve Board of Governors (US), New York University (US), Brandeis University (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
4.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Costs of Financing U.S. Federal Debt Under a Gold Standard: 1791-1933 — Thomas J. Sargent, George Hall, et al. · The Quarterly Journal of Economics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS