A framework for evaluating women’s leadership programmes

The increase in women’s leadership programmes has been paralleled by a growing demand on behalf of private and public sector stakeholders for pragmatic reporting on impact assessment. Yet, there remains limited research and tools available for conducting evaluation of women’s leadership programmes. Based on an extensive review of the literature and co-design with a sub-national Australian government, we develop an evaluation framework for women’s leadership programmes. Our framework identifies critical measures and indicators at a micro, meso and macro level that can be used by researchers and practitioners to measure the impact of women’s leadership programmes on women (and minoritised genders), organisations and structures – wider gender equality. We argue that evaluation is valuable in understanding the impact that women’s leadership programmes have as well as the impact they do not have – providing more rigorous analysis of the sometimes tenuous impacts of women’s leadership programmes. Such evaluation is critical to identifying women’s leadership programmes’ roles in tackling gender inequalities and women’s continued under-representation in leadership. It may also help identify other interventions and policy and legislative change needed to bring about a desired change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Evaluation
Published
2024-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890241284626
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A framework for evaluating women’s leadership programmes

Víctor Sojo, Alexandra N. Fisher, Elise Stephenson, Gosia Mikołajczak et al.
1 citations
Evaluation
Gender Diversity and Inequality
0.93
article

A framework for evaluating women’s leadership programmes

Víctor Sojo, Alexandra N. Fisher, Elise Stephenson, Gosia Mikołajczak, Jack Hayes, Michelle K. Ryan, Morgan Weaving, Mai Tanjitpiyanond
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The increase in women’s leadership programmes has been paralleled by a growing demand on behalf of private and public sector stakeholders for pragmatic reporting on impact assessment. Yet, there remains limited research and tools available for conducting evaluation of women’s leadership programmes. Based on an extensive review of the literature and co-design with a sub-national Australian government, we develop an evaluation framework for women’s leadership programmes. Our framework identifies critical measures and indicators at a micro, meso and macro level that can be used by researchers and practitioners to measure the impact of women’s leadership programmes on women (and minoritised genders), organisations and structures – wider gender equality. We argue that evaluation is valuable in understanding the impact that women’s leadership programmes have as well as the impact they do not have – providing more rigorous analysis of the sometimes tenuous impacts of women’s leadership programmes. Such evaluation is critical to identifying women’s leadership programmes’ roles in tackling gender inequalities and women’s continued under-representation in leadership. It may also help identify other interventions and policy and legislative change needed to bring about a desired change.

EvaluationVol. 31(1)
Australian National University (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Stanford University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
0.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.