Global Early Modern Art in Seven Objects

Abstract Globality has remarkably dominated art historical discourse and practice in the past three decades. Within early modern studies, the global turn has highlighted the possibility of and the need for broader, more connected histories. This push has provided us with a range of multivalent conceptual tools, such as mobility, connectivity, entanglement, and interconnectedness. Departing from a single object, each essay in this special issue considers the promising potential and the limitations of globalizing perspectives, and suggests how this line of research may move forward. How global is early modern art? How global are our histories of early modern art? What are the ethical and methodological issues ingrained in our stories of connections and encounters? As art historians, how do we grapple with tensions between universalism and cultural relativism? How can we strike a balance between local and global expressions of materials, space, and lived experience? In this moment of new wars, shifting borders, migrations, and natural and social disasters, we also consider what lessons art historians can draw from the forms of domination, oppression, violence, and conflict inherent in early globalization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Early Modern History
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15700658-bja10093
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Historical Art and Architecture Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global Early Modern Art in Seven Objects

Sinem Arcak Casale
1 citations
Journal of Early Modern History
Historical Art and Architecture Studies
1.96
article

Global Early Modern Art in Seven Objects

Sinem Arcak Casale
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Globality has remarkably dominated art historical discourse and practice in the past three decades. Within early modern studies, the global turn has highlighted the possibility of and the need for broader, more connected histories. This push has provided us with a range of multivalent conceptual tools, such as mobility, connectivity, entanglement, and interconnectedness. Departing from a single object, each essay in this special issue considers the promising potential and the limitations of globalizing perspectives, and suggests how this line of research may move forward. How global is early modern art? How global are our histories of early modern art? What are the ethical and methodological issues ingrained in our stories of connections and encounters? As art historians, how do we grapple with tensions between universalism and cultural relativism? How can we strike a balance between local and global expressions of materials, space, and lived experience? In this moment of new wars, shifting borders, migrations, and natural and social disasters, we also consider what lessons art historians can draw from the forms of domination, oppression, violence, and conflict inherent in early globalization.

Journal of Early Modern HistoryVol. 28(6)
University of Minnesota (US), Kunsthistorisches Institut in Florenz (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Historical Art and Architecture Studies
1.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.