For the Love of Structure

Abstract This short essay engages with an article by Jean d’Aspremont (2023 iolr ), who through a phenomenological lens reflects on the reasons why international lawyers are drawn to international organizations – a condition summarized as love . I argue that to the nine ‘drivers’ for this love identified by d’Aspremont, at least one should be added: international organizations offer structure . ‘Structure(dness)’ has strong affective power, due to a combination of images evoked by the concept particularly in an international law context. I address four: structure is aesthetically attractive; structure creates clarity and transparency; structure creates (positive) constraints; structure brings order to chaos. Of course these images, which are the groundwork for classic institutional attributes such as neutrality, fairness and a-politicalness, in our time can appear as naive projections. Still, even if ‘the progress narrative that characterised the turn to io s’ has been debunked, it is a source of inspiration at the experiential plane. And if we want to go by the insight that international organizations ultimately exist only through our gaze, this better be the gaze of a loving observer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Organizations Law Review
Published
2024-12-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/15723747-21030008
Primary Topic
International Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

For the Love of Structure

Catherine Brölmann
International Organizations Law Review
International Law and Human Rights
article

For the Love of Structure

Catherine Brölmann
article en

Abstract

Abstract This short essay engages with an article by Jean d’Aspremont (2023 iolr ), who through a phenomenological lens reflects on the reasons why international lawyers are drawn to international organizations – a condition summarized as love . I argue that to the nine ‘drivers’ for this love identified by d’Aspremont, at least one should be added: international organizations offer structure . ‘Structure(dness)’ has strong affective power, due to a combination of images evoked by the concept particularly in an international law context. I address four: structure is aesthetically attractive; structure creates clarity and transparency; structure creates (positive) constraints; structure brings order to chaos. Of course these images, which are the groundwork for classic institutional attributes such as neutrality, fairness and a-politicalness, in our time can appear as naive projections. Still, even if ‘the progress narrative that characterised the turn to io s’ has been debunked, it is a source of inspiration at the experiential plane. And if we want to go by the insight that international organizations ultimately exist only through our gaze, this better be the gaze of a loving observer.

International Organizations Law ReviewVol. 21(3)
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
International Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.