What are the priority-setting approaches for HIV/AIDS, TB and malaria programmes in Ghana? A qualitative perspective from key informants
While explicit priority-setting approaches are being expanded globally to support resource allocation decisions in health more generally, evidence from our study suggests that their use in the three GFATM-supported programmes was limited.
Authors
- Anna Vassall (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2911-1375)
- Genevieve Cecilia Aryeetey (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0530-8675)
- Adjeiwa Akosua Affram (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6990-103X)
- Augustina Koduah (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9915-5333)
- Francis Ruiz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5183-3959)
- Richmond Owusu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0066-3491)
- Justice Nonvignon
Institutions
- University of Ghana (GH)
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
- World Health Organization (CH)
- Ghana Health Service (GH)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BMJ Public Health
- Published
- 2024-12-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2024-001097
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Global Maternal and Child Health
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.11
Funders
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation