Genetic relatedness shapes social dynamics in a threatened finch: implications for population assessment
Tropical granivorous finches often form large flocks around resources. The composition of these flocks, whether they are random groups of individuals or comprise related birds travelling together, is currently unknown. To bridge this knowledge gap, we combined high-frequency location tracking with comprehensive genetic sequencing to investigate the relationship between pairwise association strength and genetic relatedness in Gouldian finches, Erythrura gouldiae , as they ranged across the landscape. We found that birds captured within close proximity were more genetically similar than birds captured further away and generally moved across the landscape together. These findings show that for the Gouldian finch, within-flock associations are influenced by genetic relatedness, and we argue that forming sibling subgroups may assist young Gouldian finches to optimally locate resources across this harsh landscape. Maintaining stable and consistent flock compositions as they move across the landscape and visit waterholes may have implications for estimating population size for Gouldian finches. This is because it will reduce the likelihood of single bird revisits and double counts within the same sampling window during waterhole surveys. By considering the flock as a distinct unit, reasonably accurate estimates could be made of a local population, and repeated counts on consecutive days could be assumed to provide reliable and replicable abundance estimates. • Integrating genetics with biotelemetry reveals social dynamics in flocking birds. • Genetic relatedness is correlated with association strength in Gouldian finches. • Gouldian finches captured close together are more likely to travel together. • Counting surveys should consider that flocks might be more stable than expected.
Authors
- Cameron J. Baker (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6664-9177)
- Mariana A. Campbell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4623-932X)
- Hamish A. Campbell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1428-1686)
- Ian J. Radford (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9388-7100)
- Mirjam Kaestli (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6053-5141)
- Tara L. Crewe (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3857-622X)
- Mara F. Müller (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6547-1004)
- Sydney J. Collett (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4461-017X)
- Sam C. Banks
Institutions
- Government of Nova Scotia (CA)
- Charles Darwin University (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Animal Behaviour
- Published
- 2024-12-13
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2024.11.013
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.09
Funders
- Australian Government
- Charles Darwin University
- Australian Research Council