Acceptability of artificial intelligence in breast screening: focus groups with the screening-eligible population in England

It will be essential that future decision-making and communication about AI implementation in breast screening (and, likely, in healthcare more widely) address concerns surrounding (1) the fallibility of AI, (2) lack of inclusion, control and transparency in relation to healthcare and technology decisions and (3) humans being left redundant and unneeded, while building on women's hopes for the technology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Public Health
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2024-000892
Citations
9
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acceptability of artificial intelligence in breast screening: focus groups with the screening-eligible population in England

Lauren Gatting, Angie A. Kehagia, Syeda Ahmed, Jo Waller et al.
9 citations
BMJ Public Health
AI in cancer detection
3.13
article

Acceptability of artificial intelligence in breast screening: focus groups with the screening-eligible population in England

Lauren Gatting, Angie A. Kehagia, Syeda Ahmed, Jo Waller, Rumana Newlands, Priscilla Meccheri
article en
9 citations

Abstract

It will be essential that future decision-making and communication about AI implementation in breast screening (and, likely, in healthcare more widely) address concerns surrounding (1) the fallibility of AI, (2) lack of inclusion, control and transparency in relation to healthcare and technology decisions and (3) humans being left redundant and unneeded, while building on women's hopes for the technology.

BMJ Public HealthVol. 2(2)
Queen Mary University of London (GB), King's College London (GB), University of Aberdeen (GB), London Cancer (GB), King's College School (GB)
Department of Health and Social Care
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
AI in cancer detection
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.