Monitoring Animal Populations With Cameras Using Open, Multistate, N‐Mixture Models

Remote cameras have become a mainstream tool for studying wildlife populations. For species whose developmental stages or states are identifiable in photographs, there are opportunities for tracking population changes and estimating demographic rates. Recent developments in hierarchical models allow for the estimation of ecological states and rates over time for unmarked animals whose states are known. However, this powerful class of models has been underutilized because they are computationally intensive, and model outputs can be difficult to interpret. Here, we use simulation to show how camera data can be analyzed with multistate, Dail-Madsen (hereafter multistate DM) models to estimate abundance, survival, and recruitment. We evaluated four commonly encountered scenarios arising from camera trap data (low and high abundance and 25% and 50% missing data) each with 18 different sample size combinations (camera sites = 40, 250; surveys = 4, 8, and 12; and years = 2, 5, 10) and evaluated the bias and precision of abundance, survival, and recruitment estimates. We also analyzed our empirical camera data on moose (<i>Alces alces</i>) with multistate DM models and compared inference with telemetry studies from the same time and region to assess the accuracy of camera studies to track moose populations. Most scenarios recovered the known parameters from our simulated data with higher accuracy and increased precision for scenarios with more sites, surveys, and/or years. Large amounts of missing data and fewer camera sites, especially at higher abundances, reduced accuracy, and precision of survival and recruitment. Our empirical analysis provided biologically realistic estimates of moose survival and recruitment and recovered the pattern of moose abundance across the region. Multistate DM models can be used for estimating demographic parameters from camera data when developmental states are clearly identifiable. We discuss several avenues for future research and caveats for using multistate DM models for large-scale population monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecology and Evolution
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.70583
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Monitoring Animal Populations With Cameras Using Open, Multistate, N‐Mixture Models

Rachel M. Cliché, Alexej P. K. Sirén, Toni Lyn Morelli, Nicholas L. Fortin et al.
2 citations
Ecology and Evolution
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
0.92
article

Monitoring Animal Populations With Cameras Using Open, Multistate, N‐Mixture Models

Rachel M. Cliché, Alexej P. K. Sirén, Toni Lyn Morelli, Nicholas L. Fortin, Tammy L. Wilson, Michael T. Hallworth, Christopher Bernier, Leighlan S. Prout, Jillian R. Kilborn, Suzanne J. Gifford, Scott Wixsom, Katherina D. Geider, Riley K. Patry
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Remote cameras have become a mainstream tool for studying wildlife populations. For species whose developmental stages or states are identifiable in photographs, there are opportunities for tracking population changes and estimating demographic rates. Recent developments in hierarchical models allow for the estimation of ecological states and rates over time for unmarked animals whose states are known. However, this powerful class of models has been underutilized because they are computationally intensive, and model outputs can be difficult to interpret. Here, we use simulation to show how camera data can be analyzed with multistate, Dail-Madsen (hereafter multistate DM) models to estimate abundance, survival, and recruitment. We evaluated four commonly encountered scenarios arising from camera trap data (low and high abundance and 25% and 50% missing data) each with 18 different sample size combinations (camera sites = 40, 250; surveys = 4, 8, and 12; and years = 2, 5, 10) and evaluated the bias and precision of abundance, survival, and recruitment estimates. We also analyzed our empirical camera data on moose (<i>Alces alces</i>) with multistate DM models and compared inference with telemetry studies from the same time and region to assess the accuracy of camera studies to track moose populations. Most scenarios recovered the known parameters from our simulated data with higher accuracy and increased precision for scenarios with more sites, surveys, and/or years. Large amounts of missing data and fewer camera sites, especially at higher abundances, reduced accuracy, and precision of survival and recruitment. Our empirical analysis provided biologically realistic estimates of moose survival and recruitment and recovered the pattern of moose abundance across the region. Multistate DM models can be used for estimating demographic parameters from camera data when developmental states are clearly identifiable. We discuss several avenues for future research and caveats for using multistate DM models for large-scale population monitoring.

Ecology and EvolutionVol. 14(12)
Dartmouth College (US), United States Geological Survey (US), New Hampshire Fish and Game Department (US), US Forest Service (US), United States Fish and Wildlife Service (US), University of Massachusetts Amherst (US), Northeast Climate Adaptation Science Center (US), Vermont Fish & Wildlife Department (US), Climate Adaptation Science Centers (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Forest Service, University of Massachusetts Amherst
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
0.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.