Making academia suck less: Supporting early career researchers studying harmful content online through a feminist ethics of care

Early career researchers (ECR) in communication and media research face increasing problems and stressors due to systemic challenges in academia, including the precarity of being an ECR and the politicization of research and targeting of researchers. For researchers studying harmful content online (HCO), research-related trauma (RRT) can compound these stressors. In this study, we present results from interviews with 18 ECRs from communication studies and adjacent disciplines studying HCO. We find researchers frequently experience RRT from harmful content, pressure from superiors to conduct research on harmful content, and outside harassment related to their research. In addition, researchers frequently use individualized self-care practices for dealing with RRT or couch their trauma. Drawing from widespread consensus by our participants that their needs are not being institutionally met, we offer a vision of what an ethics of care framework for ECRs should provide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Media & Society
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241303999
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Gender, Feminism, and Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Making academia suck less: Supporting early career researchers studying harmful content online through a feminist ethics of care

Martin Johannes Riedl, Josephine Lukito, Meredith L. Pruden, Megan A. Brown
3 citations
New Media & Society
Gender, Feminism, and Media
2.79
article

Making academia suck less: Supporting early career researchers studying harmful content online through a feminist ethics of care

Martin Johannes Riedl, Josephine Lukito, Meredith L. Pruden, Megan A. Brown
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Early career researchers (ECR) in communication and media research face increasing problems and stressors due to systemic challenges in academia, including the precarity of being an ECR and the politicization of research and targeting of researchers. For researchers studying harmful content online (HCO), research-related trauma (RRT) can compound these stressors. In this study, we present results from interviews with 18 ECRs from communication studies and adjacent disciplines studying HCO. We find researchers frequently experience RRT from harmful content, pressure from superiors to conduct research on harmful content, and outside harassment related to their research. In addition, researchers frequently use individualized self-care practices for dealing with RRT or couch their trauma. Drawing from widespread consensus by our participants that their needs are not being institutionally met, we offer a vision of what an ethics of care framework for ECRs should provide.

New Media & SocietyVol. 28(3)
Kennesaw State University (US), University of Michigan (US), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Gender, Feminism, and Media
2.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.