Modeling frequency distribution above a priority in presence of IBNR

In reinsurance, Poisson and Negative binomial distributions are employed for modeling frequency. However, the incomplete data regarding reported incurred claims above a priority level presents challenges in estimation. This paper focuses on frequency estimation using Schnieper's framework [Schnieper, R. (1991). Separating true ibnr and ibner claims. ASTIN Bulletin, 21(1), 111–127.] for claim numbering. We demonstrate that Schnieper's model is consistent with a Poisson distribution for the total number of claims above a priority at each year of development, providing a robust basis for parameter estimation. Additionally, we explain how to build an alternative assumption based on a Negative binomial distribution, which yields similar results. The study includes a bootstrap procedure to manage uncertainty in parameter estimation and a case study comparing assumptions and evaluating the impact of the bootstrap approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scandinavian Actuarial Journal
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03461238.2024.2439815
Primary Topic
Probability and Risk Models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling frequency distribution above a priority in presence of IBNR

Nicolas Baradel
Scandinavian Actuarial Journal
Probability and Risk Models
article

Modeling frequency distribution above a priority in presence of IBNR

Nicolas Baradel
article en

Abstract

In reinsurance, Poisson and Negative binomial distributions are employed for modeling frequency. However, the incomplete data regarding reported incurred claims above a priority level presents challenges in estimation. This paper focuses on frequency estimation using Schnieper's framework [Schnieper, R. (1991). Separating true ibnr and ibner claims. ASTIN Bulletin, 21(1), 111–127.] for claim numbering. We demonstrate that Schnieper's model is consistent with a Poisson distribution for the total number of claims above a priority at each year of development, providing a robust basis for parameter estimation. Additionally, we explain how to build an alternative assumption based on a Negative binomial distribution, which yields similar results. The study includes a bootstrap procedure to manage uncertainty in parameter estimation and a case study comparing assumptions and evaluating the impact of the bootstrap approach.

Scandinavian Actuarial JournalVol. 2025(5)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), École Polytechnique (FR), Institut Polytechnique de Paris (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Probability and Risk Models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.