Hybrid Legitimacy‐Seeking Strategies of Social Enterprises in Developing Countries: A Comparative Case Study of Two Microfinance Institutions

ABSTRACT Social enterprises (SEs) play a pivotal role in addressing the shortcomings of government, business, and the third sector. However, SEs operating in developing countries face a different environment than their counterparts in developed societies due to immature institutional environments. This necessitates the examination of alternative pathways to organizational legitimacy. Through a comparative analysis of two Chinese microfinance social enterprises (MSEs), this article examines how these organizations navigate the complexities of legitimacy within their operating environments. Drawing on the stakeholder perspective and the legitimacy literature, this article proposes that the survival and expansion of SEs in developing countries depend on achieving a hybrid legitimacy encompassing institutional, industry, and market dimensions. The proactive strategies adopted by the two MSEs, such as forging strategic alliances with local authorities, engaging in industry‐recognized reputational activities, and cultivating markets through philanthropic efforts, are instrumental in securing key stakeholders' support and resources. These legitimacy‐building efforts are critical to the survival of SEs and essential to achieving their dual mandate of financial sustainability and social impact. This article adds to the existing body of knowledge by delineating the multiple sources of legitimacy that are relevant to SEs in developing countries, using China as an example. It also highlights the different outcomes of institutionalist versus strategic approaches to legitimacy‐seeking, enriching both academic and practical understandings of SE resilience and growth.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nonprofit Management and Leadership
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.21639
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Family Business Performance and Succession
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hybrid Legitimacy‐Seeking Strategies of Social Enterprises in Developing Countries: A Comparative Case Study of Two Microfinance Institutions

Ximing Yin, Yixiong Huang
3 citations
Nonprofit Management and Leadership
Family Business Performance and Succession
2.02
article

Hybrid Legitimacy‐Seeking Strategies of Social Enterprises in Developing Countries: A Comparative Case Study of Two Microfinance Institutions

Ximing Yin, Yixiong Huang
article en
3 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Social enterprises (SEs) play a pivotal role in addressing the shortcomings of government, business, and the third sector. However, SEs operating in developing countries face a different environment than their counterparts in developed societies due to immature institutional environments. This necessitates the examination of alternative pathways to organizational legitimacy. Through a comparative analysis of two Chinese microfinance social enterprises (MSEs), this article examines how these organizations navigate the complexities of legitimacy within their operating environments. Drawing on the stakeholder perspective and the legitimacy literature, this article proposes that the survival and expansion of SEs in developing countries depend on achieving a hybrid legitimacy encompassing institutional, industry, and market dimensions. The proactive strategies adopted by the two MSEs, such as forging strategic alliances with local authorities, engaging in industry‐recognized reputational activities, and cultivating markets through philanthropic efforts, are instrumental in securing key stakeholders' support and resources. These legitimacy‐building efforts are critical to the survival of SEs and essential to achieving their dual mandate of financial sustainability and social impact. This article adds to the existing body of knowledge by delineating the multiple sources of legitimacy that are relevant to SEs in developing countries, using China as an example. It also highlights the different outcomes of institutionalist versus strategic approaches to legitimacy‐seeking, enriching both academic and practical understandings of SE resilience and growth.

Nonprofit Management and LeadershipVol. 35(4)
Beijing Institute of Technology (CN), ESSCA School of Management (FR), Tsinghua University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, China Scholarship Council
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Family Business Performance and Succession
2.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.