Commercialisation fears and preferred forms of governance: a mixed methods investigation to identify a trusted Australian genomics repository

This study aimed to identify operating conditions and governance mechanisms that would help to facilitate trust in, and willingness to donate to, a hypothetical Australian national genomic repository for health research where commercial use of data is permitted. Semi-structured telephone interviews with members of the Australian public (<i>N</i> = 39) clarified perceived risks and preferred repository conditions. These insights were subsequently tested experimentally in a national sample (<i>N</i> = 1,117). Contrary to what was expected based on the interviews, when certain baseline operating conditions were included (e.g., public management, data access committee to ensure data is restricted to human health research), none of the additional tested governance mechanisms (e.g., financial penalties for misuse) increased trust or donation willingness. Thus, providing suitable baseline conditions are in place, a feasible Australian genomic repository may not require external oversight or new legislation to optimize recruitment, even if commercial users are anticipated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2024-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1508261
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Commercialisation fears and preferred forms of governance: a mixed methods investigation to identify a trusted Australian genomics repository

Dianne Nicol, Brad Elphinstone, Jarrod Walshe, Mark Taylor
1 citations
Frontiers in Public Health
Ethics in Clinical Research
0.54
article

Commercialisation fears and preferred forms of governance: a mixed methods investigation to identify a trusted Australian genomics repository

Dianne Nicol, Brad Elphinstone, Jarrod Walshe, Mark Taylor
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to identify operating conditions and governance mechanisms that would help to facilitate trust in, and willingness to donate to, a hypothetical Australian national genomic repository for health research where commercial use of data is permitted. Semi-structured telephone interviews with members of the Australian public (<i>N</i> = 39) clarified perceived risks and preferred repository conditions. These insights were subsequently tested experimentally in a national sample (<i>N</i> = 1,117). Contrary to what was expected based on the interviews, when certain baseline operating conditions were included (e.g., public management, data access committee to ensure data is restricted to human health research), none of the additional tested governance mechanisms (e.g., financial penalties for misuse) increased trust or donation willingness. Thus, providing suitable baseline conditions are in place, a feasible Australian genomic repository may not require external oversight or new legislation to optimize recruitment, even if commercial users are anticipated.

Frontiers in Public HealthVol. 12
University of Tasmania (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Australian Government, Department of Health and Aged Care, Australian Government
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Ethics in Clinical Research
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.