Nonparticipation in democratic assemblies: factors, reasons, and suggestions

Abstract How should a democratic assembly be designed to attract large and diverse groups of citizens? We addressed this question by conducting a population survey in three communities with institutionalized participatory deliberative democracy in Switzerland. To examine participatory disposition in light of both individual characteristics and design features of the assembly that citizens contemplate joining, the survey comprised a conjoint experiment in which each respondent was asked to indicate his or her likelihood of participating in democratic assemblies with varying design features. The main result is that design features emphasizing the communitarian character of the assembly increase citizens’ willingness to participate, especially among disengaged citizens. Moreover, citizens were found to be less attracted by both very consensual and very adversarial meeting styles. Rather, we found meeting styles combining both controversy and consensus to be most favorable to assembly turnout. The implication is that practitioners of participatory or deliberative democracy must engage in community-building to foster turnout and inclusiveness in democratic assemblies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Political Science Review
Published
2024-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1755773924000341
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nonparticipation in democratic assemblies: factors, reasons, and suggestions

Daniel Kübler, Philippe Rochat
3 citations
European Political Science Review
Social Media and Politics
2.87
article

Nonparticipation in democratic assemblies: factors, reasons, and suggestions

Daniel Kübler, Philippe Rochat
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract How should a democratic assembly be designed to attract large and diverse groups of citizens? We addressed this question by conducting a population survey in three communities with institutionalized participatory deliberative democracy in Switzerland. To examine participatory disposition in light of both individual characteristics and design features of the assembly that citizens contemplate joining, the survey comprised a conjoint experiment in which each respondent was asked to indicate his or her likelihood of participating in democratic assemblies with varying design features. The main result is that design features emphasizing the communitarian character of the assembly increase citizens’ willingness to participate, especially among disengaged citizens. Moreover, citizens were found to be less attracted by both very consensual and very adversarial meeting styles. Rather, we found meeting styles combining both controversy and consensus to be most favorable to assembly turnout. The implication is that practitioners of participatory or deliberative democracy must engage in community-building to foster turnout and inclusiveness in democratic assemblies.

European Political Science ReviewVol. 17(4)
Liechtenstein Institute (LI), University of Zurich (CH)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Social Media and Politics
2.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Nonparticipation in democratic assemblies: factors, reasons, and suggestions — Daniel Kübler, Philippe Rochat · European Political Science Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS