An analysis of the extent of integrated thinking reflected in key performance indicators: evidence from South Africa

Purpose This study aims to develop an index to evaluate the extent to which key performance indicators (KPIs) align with the principles of integrated thinking. Design/methodology/approach Prior academic research, complemented by reporting and governance standards, is used to develop an index to gauge the extent to which KPIs take an integrated approach to performance evaluation. A mixed methods approach is adopted. A qualitative content analysis of organisations’ extra-financial reports is used to gain insights into the level of integrated thinking in performance evaluation structures using the index. Results are then calibrated using well-established integrated thinking proxies. Findings Ten indicators are identified, which point to an integrated approach to performance evaluation or the application of an underlying integrated thinking logic. The index is applied to a sample of companies from 2013 to 2021. The results point to companies increasingly incorporating integrated thinking into their KPIs. KPIs, which used to address only financial dimensions, are becoming more pluralistic and may be better described as “integrated performance indicators” (IPIs). Research limitations/implications The index is applied to KPI disclosures of a sample of companies in a single jurisdiction only. Practical implications Those charged with governance and management can use the index to structure, implement and evaluate IPIs. Investors can use the index to gauge the operationalisation of integrated thinking. Assurance providers may find the index useful when conducting risk assessments, particularly given the increased focus on the assurance of extra-financial information. Social implications Regulators can use the index for benchmarking organisations, compliance monitoring and identifying gaps between regulatory expectations and corporate behaviour. More broadly, the index could be used to promote alignment with sustainability frameworks and sustainable development goals at the national level. Originality/value This study outlines the dimensions of integrated thinking, which can be applied in the context of performance evaluation structures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability Accounting Management and Policy Journal
Published
2024-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/sampj-10-2023-0753
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An analysis of the extent of integrated thinking reflected in key performance indicators: evidence from South Africa

Cláudia Ferreira, Dusan Ecim, Warren Maroun
6 citations
Sustainability Accounting Management and Policy Journal
Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis
3.33
article

An analysis of the extent of integrated thinking reflected in key performance indicators: evidence from South Africa

Cláudia Ferreira, Dusan Ecim, Warren Maroun
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to develop an index to evaluate the extent to which key performance indicators (KPIs) align with the principles of integrated thinking. Design/methodology/approach Prior academic research, complemented by reporting and governance standards, is used to develop an index to gauge the extent to which KPIs take an integrated approach to performance evaluation. A mixed methods approach is adopted. A qualitative content analysis of organisations’ extra-financial reports is used to gain insights into the level of integrated thinking in performance evaluation structures using the index. Results are then calibrated using well-established integrated thinking proxies. Findings Ten indicators are identified, which point to an integrated approach to performance evaluation or the application of an underlying integrated thinking logic. The index is applied to a sample of companies from 2013 to 2021. The results point to companies increasingly incorporating integrated thinking into their KPIs. KPIs, which used to address only financial dimensions, are becoming more pluralistic and may be better described as “integrated performance indicators” (IPIs). Research limitations/implications The index is applied to KPI disclosures of a sample of companies in a single jurisdiction only. Practical implications Those charged with governance and management can use the index to structure, implement and evaluate IPIs. Investors can use the index to gauge the operationalisation of integrated thinking. Assurance providers may find the index useful when conducting risk assessments, particularly given the increased focus on the assurance of extra-financial information. Social implications Regulators can use the index for benchmarking organisations, compliance monitoring and identifying gaps between regulatory expectations and corporate behaviour. More broadly, the index could be used to promote alignment with sustainability frameworks and sustainable development goals at the national level. Originality/value This study outlines the dimensions of integrated thinking, which can be applied in the context of performance evaluation structures.

Sustainability Accounting Management and Policy JournalVol. 16(3)
University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis
3.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.