A short note on GIA related surface gravity versus height changes in Fennoscandia

Abstract Vertical land motion and the redistribution of masses within and on the surface of the Earth affect the Earth’s gravity field. Hence, studying the ratio between temporal changes of the surface gravity $$\left( {\dot{g}} \right)$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mfenced> <mml:mover> <mml:mi>g</mml:mi> <mml:mo>˙</mml:mo> </mml:mover> </mml:mfenced> </mml:math> and height ( $$\dot{h}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mover> <mml:mi>h</mml:mi> <mml:mo>˙</mml:mo> </mml:mover> </mml:math> ) is important in geoscience, e.g., for reduction of gravity observations, assessing satellite gravimetry missions, and tuning vertical land motion models. Sjöberg and Bagherbandi (2020) estimated a combined ratio of $$\dot{g}/\dot{h}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mover> <mml:mi>g</mml:mi> <mml:mo>˙</mml:mo> </mml:mover> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:mover> <mml:mi>h</mml:mi> <mml:mo>˙</mml:mo> </mml:mover> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> in Fennoscandia based on relative gravity observations along the 63 degree gravity line running from Vågstranda in Norway to Joensuu in Finland, 688 absolute gravity observations observed at 59 stations over Fennoscandia, monthly gravity data derived from the GRACE satellite mission between January 2003 and August 2016, as well as a land uplift model. The weighted least-squares solution of all these data was $$\dot{g}/\dot{h}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mover> <mml:mi>g</mml:mi> <mml:mo>˙</mml:mo> </mml:mover> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:mover> <mml:mi>h</mml:mi> <mml:mo>˙</mml:mo> </mml:mover> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> = − 0.166 ± 0.011 μGal/mm, which corresponds to an upper mantle density of about 3402 ± 95 kg/m 3 . The present note includes additional GRACE data to June 2017 and GRACE Follow-on data from June 2018 to November 2023. The resulting weighted least-squares solution for all data is $$\dot{g}/\dot{h}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mover> <mml:mi>g</mml:mi> <mml:mo>˙</mml:mo> </mml:mover> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:mover> <mml:mi>h</mml:mi> <mml:mo>˙</mml:mo> </mml:mover> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> = − 0.160 ± 0.011 μGal/mm, yielding an upper mantle density of about 3546 ± 71 kg/m 3 . The outcomes show the importance of satellite gravimetry data in Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) modeling and other parameters such as land uplift rate. Utilizing a longer time span of GRACE and GRACE Follow-on data allows us to capture fine variations and trends in the gravity-to-height ratio with better precision. This will be useful for constraining and adjusting GIA models and refining gravity observations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geodesy
Published
2024-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-024-01921-7
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A short note on GIA related surface gravity versus height changes in Fennoscandia

Lars E. Sjöberg, Mohammad Bagherbandi
1 citations
Journal of Geodesy
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
0.48
article

A short note on GIA related surface gravity versus height changes in Fennoscandia

Lars E. Sjöberg, Mohammad Bagherbandi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Vertical land motion and the redistribution of masses within and on the surface of the Earth affect the Earth’s gravity field. Hence, studying the ratio between temporal changes of the surface gravity $$\left( {\dot{g}} \right)$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mfenced> <mml:mover> <mml:mi>g</mml:mi> <mml:mo>˙</mml:mo> </mml:mover> </mml:mfenced> </mml:math> and height ( $$\dot{h}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mover> <mml:mi>h</mml:mi> <mml:mo>˙</mml:mo> </mml:mover> </mml:math> ) is important in geoscience, e.g., for reduction of gravity observations, assessing satellite gravimetry missions, and tuning vertical land motion models. Sjöberg and Bagherbandi (2020) estimated a combined ratio of $$\dot{g}/\dot{h}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mover> <mml:mi>g</mml:mi> <mml:mo>˙</mml:mo> </mml:mover> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:mover> <mml:mi>h</mml:mi> <mml:mo>˙</mml:mo> </mml:mover> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> in Fennoscandia based on relative gravity observations along the 63 degree gravity line running from Vågstranda in Norway to Joensuu in Finland, 688 absolute gravity observations observed at 59 stations over Fennoscandia, monthly gravity data derived from the GRACE satellite mission between January 2003 and August 2016, as well as a land uplift model. The weighted least-squares solution of all these data was $$\dot{g}/\dot{h}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mover> <mml:mi>g</mml:mi> <mml:mo>˙</mml:mo> </mml:mover> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:mover> <mml:mi>h</mml:mi> <mml:mo>˙</mml:mo> </mml:mover> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> = − 0.166 ± 0.011 μGal/mm, which corresponds to an upper mantle density of about 3402 ± 95 kg/m 3 . The present note includes additional GRACE data to June 2017 and GRACE Follow-on data from June 2018 to November 2023. The resulting weighted least-squares solution for all data is $$\dot{g}/\dot{h}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mover> <mml:mi>g</mml:mi> <mml:mo>˙</mml:mo> </mml:mover> <mml:mo>/</mml:mo> <mml:mover> <mml:mi>h</mml:mi> <mml:mo>˙</mml:mo> </mml:mover> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> = − 0.160 ± 0.011 μGal/mm, yielding an upper mantle density of about 3546 ± 71 kg/m 3 . The outcomes show the importance of satellite gravimetry data in Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) modeling and other parameters such as land uplift rate. Utilizing a longer time span of GRACE and GRACE Follow-on data allows us to capture fine variations and trends in the gravity-to-height ratio with better precision. This will be useful for constraining and adjusting GIA models and refining gravity observations.

Journal of GeodesyVol. 99(1)
University of Gävle (SE), KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
0.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.