Is Transformative Dialogue a Possible and Justifiable Intervention for Resolving Intractable Conflicts?

ABSTRACT The world is suffering from intractable conflicts. Societies and families are torn apart and individuals are threatened in their existence. In this article, three controverses are explored about how to deal with intractable conflicts. In taking a closer look, these intractable conflicts can be understood as “identity‐related.” It can be shown that this identity dimension of a conflict is not sufficiently addressed by argumentation and negotiation. Still, accepting that some differences in value and belief seem so fundamentally incompatible that we should give up striving for a solution need not be the conclusion. There are decades of positive reports of practical experience with various transformative methods on a microscale available that can be taken on to develop interventions to solve intractable conflicts on a societal level. Is it possible and justifiable to develop and institutionalize “transformation” as a third general approach next to argumentation and negotiation? Can interventions aiming at a transformation of self‐understanding and identity be introduced without manipulation and infringement of autonomy?

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Conflict Resolution Quarterly
Published
2024-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21461
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Complex Systems and Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.49

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Transformative Dialogue a Possible and Justifiable Intervention for Resolving Intractable Conflicts?

Florian Henricus Willibrord Bekkers
1 citations
Conflict Resolution Quarterly
Complex Systems and Decision Making
0.49
article

Is Transformative Dialogue a Possible and Justifiable Intervention for Resolving Intractable Conflicts?

Florian Henricus Willibrord Bekkers
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT The world is suffering from intractable conflicts. Societies and families are torn apart and individuals are threatened in their existence. In this article, three controverses are explored about how to deal with intractable conflicts. In taking a closer look, these intractable conflicts can be understood as “identity‐related.” It can be shown that this identity dimension of a conflict is not sufficiently addressed by argumentation and negotiation. Still, accepting that some differences in value and belief seem so fundamentally incompatible that we should give up striving for a solution need not be the conclusion. There are decades of positive reports of practical experience with various transformative methods on a microscale available that can be taken on to develop interventions to solve intractable conflicts on a societal level. Is it possible and justifiable to develop and institutionalize “transformation” as a third general approach next to argumentation and negotiation? Can interventions aiming at a transformation of self‐understanding and identity be introduced without manipulation and infringement of autonomy?

Conflict Resolution QuarterlyVol. 42(3)
Universiteit Utrecht
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Complex Systems and Decision Making
0.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.