A qualitative study to explain the criteria of nursing managers in selecting effective nursing diagnosis

Abstract Objective This study aimed to explain the criteria of managers at different levels of nursing in selecting effective nursing diagnosis. Methods In conventional content analysis, 10 nursing managers at different levels including head nurse, supervisor, and nursing manager were interviewed. Data was collected with semi-structured interviews and a narrative approach. Data analysis was performed using the Zhang–Wildemuth method simultaneously with sampling. Results Four head nurses, four supervisors (educational, clinical), and two nursing managers were interviewed. The results of the analysis led to the extraction of two main categories: centrality of the nursing profession, with the sub-categories compatibility with nursing practices and compliance with organizational and professional principles of nursing, and covering the patient care aspect, with sub-categories of having potential to facilitate and adapting to patient care conditions. Conclusions The analysis of the views of nursing managers shows that health managers should consider various management aspects such as functional and organizational to increase the efficiency of nursing interventions in the selection of nursing diagnostic systems. From the point of view of health managers, nursing diagnoses should cover the considerations of patients, nurses, and work environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers of Nursing
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/fon-2024-0051
Primary Topic
Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A qualitative study to explain the criteria of nursing managers in selecting effective nursing diagnosis

Reza Norouzadeh, Mohammad Abbasinia, Bahman Aghaie, Zahra Hezbiyan et al.
Frontiers of Nursing
Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
article

A qualitative study to explain the criteria of nursing managers in selecting effective nursing diagnosis

Reza Norouzadeh, Mohammad Abbasinia, Bahman Aghaie, Zahra Hezbiyan, Mina Abolfazli, Alaa Jawad Kadhim, Hanie Dahmardeh
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective This study aimed to explain the criteria of managers at different levels of nursing in selecting effective nursing diagnosis. Methods In conventional content analysis, 10 nursing managers at different levels including head nurse, supervisor, and nursing manager were interviewed. Data was collected with semi-structured interviews and a narrative approach. Data analysis was performed using the Zhang–Wildemuth method simultaneously with sampling. Results Four head nurses, four supervisors (educational, clinical), and two nursing managers were interviewed. The results of the analysis led to the extraction of two main categories: centrality of the nursing profession, with the sub-categories compatibility with nursing practices and compliance with organizational and professional principles of nursing, and covering the patient care aspect, with sub-categories of having potential to facilitate and adapting to patient care conditions. Conclusions The analysis of the views of nursing managers shows that health managers should consider various management aspects such as functional and organizational to increase the efficiency of nursing interventions in the selection of nursing diagnostic systems. From the point of view of health managers, nursing diagnoses should cover the considerations of patients, nurses, and work environments.

Frontiers of NursingVol. 11(4)
Shahed University (IR), University of Baghdad (IQ), Iranshahr University (IR), Jahrom University of Medical Sciences (IR), Zahedan University of Medical Sciences (IR), Alborz University of Medical Sciences (IR), Qom University of Medical Science and Health Services (IR)
Alborz University of Medical Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.