Petrarca, Proba of toch Plinius?

Classical language teachers in Dutch secondary schools are free to choose the texts they read with their students, with the exception of (part of) the final year for which a national committee sets an annually changing text corpus of prose or poetry on which the national final examination is based. So far, there is no record of the actual selection of texts that teachers choose to read with their students, and we know even less about the selection process. However, there is discussion among teachers about whether canonical or non-canonical texts are best suited for secondary education. Moreover, we have recently witnessed processes of (re)canonisation in other school subjects in the field of humanities. This article explores current debates around the choices of canonical or non-canonical texts in secondary classical education using two panel discussions and a questionnaire as sources. Second, we contextualize these debates by describing recent developments in the teaching of history and Dutch literature in secondary education. Finally, we introduce a recently started PhD project whose questions are the prelude to further research on this topic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lampas
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5117/lam2024.4.006.cler
Primary Topic
Classical Philosophy and Thought
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Petrarca, Proba of toch Plinius?

Lidewij van Gils, Bas Clercx
Lampas
Classical Philosophy and Thought
article

Petrarca, Proba of toch Plinius?

Lidewij van Gils, Bas Clercx
article en

Abstract

Classical language teachers in Dutch secondary schools are free to choose the texts they read with their students, with the exception of (part of) the final year for which a national committee sets an annually changing text corpus of prose or poetry on which the national final examination is based. So far, there is no record of the actual selection of texts that teachers choose to read with their students, and we know even less about the selection process. However, there is discussion among teachers about whether canonical or non-canonical texts are best suited for secondary education. Moreover, we have recently witnessed processes of (re)canonisation in other school subjects in the field of humanities. This article explores current debates around the choices of canonical or non-canonical texts in secondary classical education using two panel discussions and a questionnaire as sources. Second, we contextualize these debates by describing recent developments in the teaching of history and Dutch literature in secondary education. Finally, we introduce a recently started PhD project whose questions are the prelude to further research on this topic.

LampasVol. 57(4)
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Classical Philosophy and Thought
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.