Acceleration by Stepsize Hedging: Multi-Step Descent and the Silver Stepsize Schedule

Can we accelerate the convergence of gradient descent without changing the algorithm—just by judiciously choosing stepsizes? Surprisingly, we show that the answer is yes. Our proposed Silver Stepsize Schedule optimizes strongly convex functions in \(\kappa ^{\log _{\rho } 2} \approx \kappa ^{0.7864}\) iterations, where \(\rho =1+\sqrt {2}\) is the silver ratio and κ is the condition number. This is intermediate between the textbook unaccelerated rate κ and the accelerated rate \(\kappa ^{1/2}\) due to Nesterov in 1983. The non-strongly convex setting is conceptually identical, and standard black-box reductions imply an analogous partially accelerated rate \(\varepsilon ^{-\log _{\rho } 2} \approx \varepsilon ^{-0.7864}\) . We conjecture and provide partial evidence that these rates are optimal among all stepsize schedules. The Silver Stepsize Schedule is constructed recursively in a fully explicit way. It is non-monotonic, fractal-like, and approximately periodic of period \(\kappa ^{\log _{\rho } 2}\) . This leads to a phase transition in the convergence rate: initially super-exponential (acceleration regime), then exponential (saturation regime). The core algorithmic intuition is hedging between individually suboptimal strategies—short steps and long steps—since bad cases for the former are good cases for the latter, and vice versa. Properly combining these stepsizes yields faster convergence due to the misalignment of worst-case functions. The key challenge in proving this speedup is enforcing long-range consistency conditions along the algorithm’s trajectory. We do this by developing a technique that recursively glues constraints from different portions of the trajectory, thus removing a key stumbling block in previous analyses of optimization algorithms. More broadly, we believe that the concepts of hedging and multi-step descent have the potential to be powerful algorithmic paradigms in a variety of contexts in optimization and beyond. This article publishes and extends the first author’s 2018 master’s thesis (advised by the second author)—which established for the first time that judiciously choosing stepsizes can enable acceleration in convex optimization. Prior to this thesis, the only such result was for the special case of quadratic optimization, due to Young in 1953.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the ACM
Published
2024-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3708502
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Probability and Risk Models
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.47
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acceleration by Stepsize Hedging: Multi-Step Descent and the Silver Stepsize Schedule

Pablo A. Parrilo, Jason M. Altschuler
3 citations
Journal of the ACM
Probability and Risk Models
1.47
article

Acceleration by Stepsize Hedging: Multi-Step Descent and the Silver Stepsize Schedule

Pablo A. Parrilo, Jason M. Altschuler
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Can we accelerate the convergence of gradient descent without changing the algorithm—just by judiciously choosing stepsizes? Surprisingly, we show that the answer is yes. Our proposed Silver Stepsize Schedule optimizes strongly convex functions in \(\kappa ^{\log _{\rho } 2} \approx \kappa ^{0.7864}\) iterations, where \(\rho =1+\sqrt {2}\) is the silver ratio and κ is the condition number. This is intermediate between the textbook unaccelerated rate κ and the accelerated rate \(\kappa ^{1/2}\) due to Nesterov in 1983. The non-strongly convex setting is conceptually identical, and standard black-box reductions imply an analogous partially accelerated rate \(\varepsilon ^{-\log _{\rho } 2} \approx \varepsilon ^{-0.7864}\) . We conjecture and provide partial evidence that these rates are optimal among all stepsize schedules. The Silver Stepsize Schedule is constructed recursively in a fully explicit way. It is non-monotonic, fractal-like, and approximately periodic of period \(\kappa ^{\log _{\rho } 2}\) . This leads to a phase transition in the convergence rate: initially super-exponential (acceleration regime), then exponential (saturation regime). The core algorithmic intuition is hedging between individually suboptimal strategies—short steps and long steps—since bad cases for the former are good cases for the latter, and vice versa. Properly combining these stepsizes yields faster convergence due to the misalignment of worst-case functions. The key challenge in proving this speedup is enforcing long-range consistency conditions along the algorithm’s trajectory. We do this by developing a technique that recursively glues constraints from different portions of the trajectory, thus removing a key stumbling block in previous analyses of optimization algorithms. More broadly, we believe that the concepts of hedging and multi-step descent have the potential to be powerful algorithmic paradigms in a variety of contexts in optimization and beyond. This article publishes and extends the first author’s 2018 master’s thesis (advised by the second author)—which established for the first time that judiciously choosing stepsizes can enable acceleration in convex optimization. Prior to this thesis, the only such result was for the special case of quadratic optimization, due to Young in 1953.

Journal of the ACMVol. 72(2)
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Probability and Risk Models
1.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.