CONSTRUCTION CARBON FOOTPRINT REDUCTION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TRADITIONAL AND INNOVATIVE MATERIALS

This study examines the carbon footprint of various construction materials, focusing on embodied carbon and its role in achieving sustainable construction. The objective is to examine carbon footprint as an indicator of sustainable development. To assess it, the authors employed a scenario-based approach grounded in the concept of dynamic balance. The authors quantitatively determine greenhouse gas emissions at different stages of the project's life cycle. Risk scenarios are developed, and their parameters are defined. Recalculating the scenario using foamed glass, best practices, and other factors reveals a 56 % reduction in carbon footprint. This represents a substantial step towards environmental sustainability, aligning with global best practices for low-carbon construction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Problems of risk management in the technosphere
Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61260/1998-8990-2024-3-162-174
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CONSTRUCTION CARBON FOOTPRINT REDUCTION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TRADITIONAL AND INNOVATIVE MATERIALS

Nazim Mamedov, Elena Smirnova, Gennadiy Danilovich
Problems of risk management in the technosphere
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
article

CONSTRUCTION CARBON FOOTPRINT REDUCTION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TRADITIONAL AND INNOVATIVE MATERIALS

Nazim Mamedov, Elena Smirnova, Gennadiy Danilovich
article en

Abstract

This study examines the carbon footprint of various construction materials, focusing on embodied carbon and its role in achieving sustainable construction. The objective is to examine carbon footprint as an indicator of sustainable development. To assess it, the authors employed a scenario-based approach grounded in the concept of dynamic balance. The authors quantitatively determine greenhouse gas emissions at different stages of the project's life cycle. Risk scenarios are developed, and their parameters are defined. Recalculating the scenario using foamed glass, best practices, and other factors reveals a 56 % reduction in carbon footprint. This represents a substantial step towards environmental sustainability, aligning with global best practices for low-carbon construction.

Problems of risk management in the technosphereVol. 2024(3)
Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering (RU), American Standard (United States) (US), Academy of the State Fire Service EMERCOM of Russia (RU)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.