Time course of indirect reply processing in native and non-native Mandarin speakers: An ERP study

Abstract To communicate successfully, listeners must decode both the literal and intended meanings of a speaker’s message. This ability is especially crucial when processing indirect replies as intended meanings can differ significantly from what was said. How native and non-native speakers differ in this ability is an open question. The present study investigated differences in the time course of indirect reply processing in native and non-native Mandarin speakers. EEG signals were recorded while participants were presented with conversations that differed in their directness. For indirect replies, native speakers exhibited a larger left anterior N400 and posterior late positive component (LPC). Conversely, non-native speakers exhibited a larger left-distributed LPC and delayed LPC. Findings support that non-native speakers exhibit delayed processing of indirect replies, potentially because of cognitive resource limitations. Findings from the present study have implications for a broad range of investigations on human communication and second language processing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bilingualism Language and Cognition
Published
2024-12-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728924000695
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Time course of indirect reply processing in native and non-native Mandarin speakers: An ERP study

Xiaoxi Pan, Adam John Privitera, Maoyao Xu, Xiuping Zhang et al.
1 citations
Bilingualism Language and Cognition
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
0.34
article

Time course of indirect reply processing in native and non-native Mandarin speakers: An ERP study

Xiaoxi Pan, Adam John Privitera, Maoyao Xu, Xiuping Zhang, Yizhu Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract To communicate successfully, listeners must decode both the literal and intended meanings of a speaker’s message. This ability is especially crucial when processing indirect replies as intended meanings can differ significantly from what was said. How native and non-native speakers differ in this ability is an open question. The present study investigated differences in the time course of indirect reply processing in native and non-native Mandarin speakers. EEG signals were recorded while participants were presented with conversations that differed in their directness. For indirect replies, native speakers exhibited a larger left anterior N400 and posterior late positive component (LPC). Conversely, non-native speakers exhibited a larger left-distributed LPC and delayed LPC. Findings support that non-native speakers exhibit delayed processing of indirect replies, potentially because of cognitive resource limitations. Findings from the present study have implications for a broad range of investigations on human communication and second language processing.

Bilingualism Language and CognitionVol. 28(3)
Beijing Language and Culture University (CN), Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
0.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Time course of indirect reply processing in native and non-native Mandarin speakers: An ERP study — Xiaoxi Pan, Adam John Privitera, et al. · Bilingualism Language and Cognition (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS